Finpeers (@finpeers)

In today's world, what's scarce isn't capital, it's the trust between the people who hold it and the people building the future. That's why we started Finpeers back in 2022 to build the relationship layer Bitcoin was missing.

Full conversation between @Sanderandersenn
and @julian_liniger on the Relai Bitcoin Podcast below.

1:07

Relai 🇨🇭 Verified account @relai_app Sep 24

Our very own @julian_liniger had the amazing @Sanderandersenn on the Relai Bitcoin Podcast.

In it, they talked about H100 Group's BTC plans, why the Nordics are catching up, and how cool (pun for cool Scandinavians) Bitcoin will be with family offices!

Tune into the full episode 👇

View quoted post on X

Finpeers @finpeers Feb 24

Two Capital Bases, Complementary Needs 🟢🟠

Finpeers Verified account @finpeers Feb 23

Bitcoin-backed credit serves two different capital bases with complementary needs.

On one side, you have large public and private Bitcoin balance sheets seeking productive use of Bitcoin as collateral. On the other side, you have trillions of dollars in traditional fiat capital seeking attractive yield and exposure to Bitcoin-linked yield, with control that aligns with existing risk profiles and mandates.

By structuring dual-collateralization, Bitcoin will serve as the primary liquid collateral. The cash-flow asset is the component that serves the debt.

@Sanderandersenn and @GrafYves on @OneChairPod

View quoted post on X

Finpeers @finpeers Feb 23

Bitcoin-backed credit serves two different capital bases with complementary needs.

On one side, you have large public and private Bitcoin balance sheets seeking productive use of Bitcoin as collateral. On the other side, you have trillions of dollars in traditional fiat capital seeking attractive yield and exposure to Bitcoin-linked yield, with control that aligns with existing risk profiles and mandates.

By structuring dual-collateralization, Bitcoin will serve as the primary liquid collateral. The cash-flow asset is the component that serves the debt.

@Sanderandersenn and @GrafYves on @OneChairPod

1:59

Finpeers @finpeers Feb 16

Over $1T of Bitcoin sits outside traditional banking and long-term financing. Today, most holders are limited to short-term, margin call-driven loans.

The opportunity is clear: use Bitcoin as institutional-grade collateral for long-duration private credit.

Bitcoin secures the structure.
Cash-flowing real-world assets service the debt.
Lenders earn 8–12% with strong downside protection through overcollateralization.

This turns Bitcoin from a passive store of value into productive financial infrastructure.

Conversation between @Sanderandersenn and @GrafYves on @OneChairPod

2:09

Finpeers @finpeers Dec 19, 2025

Volatility combined with long-term capital is not a risk, but an opportunity. Outcomes are defined not by short-term price movements, but by positioning, capital structure, and time horizon.

Yves Choueifaty Verified account @YChoueifaty Dec 17, 2025

#Bitcoin is too risky.

This sentence is repeated so often that it has ended up replacing analysis.

In this note: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…,
I revisit this claim strictly from the perspective of investment discipline.

Yes, Bitcoin is extraordinarily volatile — probably the most volatile large-scale asset ever accessible to investors. This is beyond dispute. But volatility is not a verdict; it is a parameter.

In asset management, risk should never be a reason to exclude an asset. It is a reason to #Size the exposure. An asset is never “too risky” in itself; it is simply held in a size that is inconsistent with its volatility.

Investment follows a simple sequence:
first, decide whether an asset makes sense (the Investment Thesis),
then decide how much to hold (Risk Management).

Reversing this sequence — excluding an asset before even examining the thesis, solely on the grounds of risk — is not prudence. It is a reasoning error.
Even highly volatile assets can, at very small allocations, reduce overall portfolio risk through diversification. Danger is a matter of dosage, not of nature.
Excluding Bitcoin “because it is risky” reflects a misunderstanding of the elementary principles of portfolio construction — and the expression “speculative asset”, often used in this debate, corresponds to no concept in academic finance.

View quoted post on X

Finpeers

Latest posts 5