@0xNapalm
Pinned post
+$1000 for a couple of hours
only on PolymarketView quoted post on X
JUST IN: Only 90 wallets currently qualify for Polymarket’s $50,000 perps competition
not competing yet? take a look for yourself: [poly.market/perps-leaderbo…]
my referral deal gets you $100M+ volume-tier fees throughout the competition:
Taker: 0.0270% instead of 0.0400%
Maker: 0.0020% instead of 0.0125%
that’s 32.5% less in taker fees and 84% less in maker fees
to claim the discount, register your perps wallet using this form [docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…] and enter 0xNapalm as your referrer
gl glView quoted post on X
How to farm the $50k Polymarket Perps competition most efficiently: all the scoring math with and without boosters + STRATEGIES
What to focus on - PnL or volume? And how useful the x3 ANT trading boost really is?
Your rank is determined by this formula:
Score = PnL × √(Boost × Volume)
The square root penalizes wash-trading and rewards pure profit, ANT adds x3 to your volume
The user in the last prize spot (top 50 - $250 reward) has a score of roughly 172k (297.76k volume + $292.8 PnL)
Let's break down all the angles for approaching the farming strategy and how to make it as efficient as possible
Strategy 1: Standard Markets (x1 Boost)
> Low PnL (+$100): You need to trade $3.06 Million in volume to hit a 175k Score, farming volume with near-zero profit is highly inefficient
> High PnL (+$1,000): Mathematically, you only need $30k volume but since you must do $100k to qualify, doing the bare minimum 100k volume with $1k profit pushes your Score to ~316,200
Strategy 2: Using the ANT (x3) Boost
The multiplier is applied before the square root, meaning it divides the real USD volume you need to trade by 3
> Low PnL (+$100): The required real volume to hit 175k drops to $1.02 Million
> High PnL (+$1,000): If you hit the mandatory $100k volume minimum exclusively on ANT, it counts as $300k effective volume. With $1k PnL, your Score jumps to ~547,700
So your choice is using a booster with a focus on PnL
Since you can't always find a setup on ANT with a 3x boost, we have AMD, ARM, and SOXL with a smaller 2x boostView quoted post on X
Iowa is a real fight and I’m choosing Republicans
сhoosing some red side with Polymarket’s new Build your map with 96x if it hits!
most of the board is still overpricing the blue side on these tight races
what inside:
⊳ Texas: Talarico (D) 73%. Taking the blue side, clear edge but not locked
⊳ Kansas: Marshall (R) still listed, Dems at 63%. Fading the incumbent
⊳ Alaska: Peltola (D) 72%. Clean lean, riding with the market
⊳ Ohio: Husted (R) favored, Dems only 28%. Taking the underdog
⊳ Michigan: El-Sayed (D) 81%. Highest confidence on the board
⊳ Maine: Jackson (D) 73%. Another solid Dem lean
⊳ Iowa: Hinson (R) vs Dems basically a coin flip 52-49
true toss-up that decides the map
if the underdogs and tight races break the right way, almost 100x
most of these still look mispriced relative to how close the actual races areView quoted post on X
Iowa is a real fight and I’m choosing Republicans
сhoosing some red side with Polymarket’s new Build your map with 96x if it hits!
most of the board is still overpricing the blue side on these tight races
what inside:
⊳ Texas: Talarico (D) 73%. Taking the blue side, clear edge but not locked
⊳ Kansas: Marshall (R) still listed, Dems at 63%. Fading the incumbent
⊳ Alaska: Peltola (D) 72%. Clean lean, riding with the market
⊳ Ohio: Husted (R) favored, Dems only 28%. Taking the underdog
⊳ Michigan: El-Sayed (D) 81%. Highest confidence on the board
⊳ Maine: Jackson (D) 73%. Another solid Dem lean
⊳ Iowa: Hinson (R) vs Dems basically a coin flip 52-49
true toss-up that decides the map
if the underdogs and tight races break the right way, almost 100x
most of these still look mispriced relative to how close the actual races areView quoted post on X
