Twitxy Saved

0xredman 🛡️

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@0xredman

CryptoEvangelist | Researcher | Analyst | Contributor @kakarotzkevm @zama @raycashxyz tag : redman
Earth Joined January 2016
2.4K Following 3.6K Followers 20K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

0xredman 🛡️ Verified account @0xredman
What If ENS and NFT Auctions Were Private?
Today’s on-chain auctions are fundamentally broken.
Every bid is public. Everyone sees everyone else’s strategy. And as a result, nobody reveals their true valuation.

If you own a unique ENS name and I am willing to pay 1 ETH for it, I will never post that publicly. The moment I do, I become the price anchor for every other bidder. Instead of discovering real value, the market converges around signals, not intent.

Private computation is the unlock! with just two serious stacks in play today: @zama (FHE) and @Zcash / @Starknet (ZK).

With @zama 's confidential computing technology, bidders can submit encrypted bids that no one else can see, not even the marketplace, while the auction logic still executes correctly. The marketplace still collects its fee. The only thing that disappears is strategic leakage.

Fixing the “Legendary NFT Crash”
Some NFTs were once bought by celebrities at outrageous prices. Many of them have since collapsed in value.

Justin Bieber spent about $1.3 million on Bored Ape #3001 in 2022. Today it is worth roughly $12,500! 95% decline. Stephen Curry and Madonna made similar high-profile purchases, only to see their NFTs lose over 60–80% of their value.

Now that the hype has faded, owners are afraid to list again. Why?
✅ Public bids expose desperation.
✅ Low visible offers scare away serious buyers.
✅ Price discovery becomes psychological, not economic.

With private bids, assets can be relisted without public embarrassment. The market can rediscover true value without social pressure or manipulation.

Why Sealed Bids Create Better Markets
Imagine a real-world auction: the last vehicle ever used by Michael Jackson. Twenty whales want it. All have liquidity. All have their own valuation.

In today’s public auction model, they strategically underbid, watch each other, and distort the outcome. The auction drags on. Value is hidden.

With sealed, confidential bids:
✅ Everyone submits their true price.
✅ The asset goes to whoever values it most.
✅ The auction finishes faster! no games, no sniping.

A New Market Structure
Confidential auctions don’t just improve privacy.
They deliver:
✅ Better price discovery
✅ Higher final sale prices
✅ Faster auctions
✅ Less manipulation

This is not a feature upgrade.
It is a fundamental redesign of how digital markets should work.
34 replies 15 reposts 102 likes 6.7K views View on X
0xredman 🛡️ Verified account @0xredman
Private by Default? What We Learned at the Zama × Web3Bridge Workshop 👨‍💻

Yesterday, we brought builders, researchers and curious minds together in Lagos for a workshop centred around one theme: Confidential Onchain Finance.

We didn't want a panel where everyone simply nods along and takes turns giving speeches. So, we built the entire session around a single question and allowed people to disagree:

Can finance be private on a public ledger and still be trusted?

Why this question?

We opened with a simple picture. Imagine your salary, rent payments and savings balance pinned to a public noticeboard that anyone in the world can read, forever. That's how most blockchains work today.

Then we asked the room two questions: Who would put their entire financial life on a fully public ledger? And who thinks criminals would love a fully private one?

Those two questions capture the whole tension in a nutshell. Transparency makes blockchains trustworthy, but it can also make them unsuitable for institutions. Privacy addresses that problem, but it also makes regulators nervous.

Why confidentiality matters

The panel started with the problem. When every transaction is public by default, things break. Salaries leak. Trading strategies get front-run. Balances and identities get stitched together by anyone who cares to look.

We asked who needs confidentiality most: everyday users, businesses or institutions. We also discussed what's actually ready today versus what's still a lab experiment, across zero-knowledge proofs (ZK), fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) and multi-party computation (MPC).

FHE allows you to compute on encrypted data, while ZK allows you to prove that something is true without revealing the underlying data.

The Trust Dilemma

This is where the real debate happened: privacy versus compliance.

Is privacy in crypto a feature or a red flag for regulators? Can we build "compliant privacy" through mechanisms such as selective disclosure or viewing keys for auditors, or is that a contradiction? And perhaps the hardest question: who should hold the keys to access private data? Users, regulators, or no one?

We also brought the conversation closer to home. What does confidential finance mean for people in Nigeria and across Africa, where financial surveillance and fraud are both very real concerns?

For many people here, remittances and stablecoins aren't just theories. They're how money moves.

Then we sped things up with 15-second answers to questions like:

- What's the biggest myth about onchain privacy?
- Should privacy be the default or a choice?

Privacy should be the default, not a privilege users have to opt into. People shouldn't have to choose between using technology and protecting their personal information. Transparency should be by choice; privacy should be by default.

From debate to building

After the roundtable, the CEO of @Web3bridge presented on confidential onchain finance. I followed with a presentation on @raycashxyz , and @DefiPreacherr rounded off the day with a hands-on technical workshop.

We spent the morning debating whether confidential finance was possible. Then we explored how Zama's technology is making it possible and practical.

By the afternoon, participants were getting hands-on experience with how the technology works and how it can be integrated into their applications.

Where I've landed

Wanting privacy doesn't mean you have dirty hands or something to hide. It simply means you want the freedom to decide what information you share, with whom, and when.

Privacy on a public ledger isn't about hiding. It's about choosing who sees what.

The conversation isn't finished, but it's certainly clearer now than it was yesterday morning.

Huge thanks to @Zama, @randhindi @Web3Bridge , our panelists @Ebunayo08, @DefiPreacherr and @_peacejoel__, and everyone who showed up, participated and challenged ideas.

What do you think: should onchain finance be private by default? 👇
13 replies 20 reposts 62 likes 3.4K views View on X
0xredman 🛡️ Verified account @0xredman
Zama is coming together with @Web3Bridge for a hands-on workshop on confidential onchain finance.

Public blockchains have made financial activity more open and verifiable, but they also expose information that should not always be public.

This workshop will explore how @zama is bringing confidentiality to onchain applications with FHE, and how builders can start creating applications where sensitive financial data stays encrypted while the blockchain remains verifiable.

We’ll cover the ideas behind confidential finance, look at how the Zama Protocol works, and move into a practical builder session.

📍 Web3Bridge, Nigeria
📅 6th November 2026
⏰ 10am - 1pm

Registration details: luma.com/rxse8qq7

More details soon.
7 replies 12 reposts 56 likes 7.4K views View on X