Twitxy Saved

Alexander PCs

This account is verified because it's an official organization on X. Learn more

@AlexanderPCS

Expertly Crafted Custom PCs. AI and data science for some of your favorite (and least favorite) teams and players. NVIDIA Partnered. 🇺🇸 Veteran Owned.
Cary, IL AlexanderPCs.com Joined April 2020
349 Following 4.3K Followers 3.9K Posts

Latest posts 5

Alexander PCs @AlexanderPCS
We’d noticed a higher incidence of drive failures in PCs with Radeon GPUs. Was only just starting to become apparent beyond statistical anomaly. This seems likely to be the cause.
Tom's Hardware @tomshardware 17h
AMD admits GPU driver bug is writing data continuously, wearing out SSDs — Radeon owner claims External Events Utility used up 1% of SSD health every month for over a year, company promises a fix soon tomshardware.com/pc-components/…
View quoted post on X
Alexander PCs @AlexanderPCS
"The scandal was a detonator set off right on cue. The real goal was to plug the holes chips were leaking through."

🎯🎯🎯
Jukan Verified account @jukan05 1d
Taiwanese semiconductor analyst Andrew Lu’s take on the recent scandal involving Jensen Huang:

Why the US Seized on the Scandal to Draw Its Sword: Three Strategic Objectives

The purpose of this scandal is by no means to expose an affair. It is to force through three critical objectives that had made no headway in the tech war between the US and China because Jensen Huang opposed them.

The first cut: Completely destroy the legitimacy of Jensen Huang's lobbying against sanctions in Washington

Over the past two years, the loudest and most influential business leader in Silicon Valley opposing a total ban on chip exports to China has been Jensen Huang. He has told the White House the same thing all along: "Cede the Chinese market to Huawei, and the only one that ends up dead is the American tech industry."

But the moment US intelligence labels the woman named as Huang's affair partner "a spy working for China's Ministry of State Security who sought to steer the US toward easing its chip controls," every bit of lobbying he has done for looser controls takes on an entirely different political meaning. It becomes a national security matter, raising the possibility that a foreign spy used a secret relationship to exert influence.

Huang can no longer say a single word in defense of the Chinese market before Congress or the White House. If he does, he will be branded as someone who "fell for an intelligence operation and still hasn't come to his senses."

The second cut: Reverse the H200 export approvals for China and sever the link between Chinese shell companies and Southeast Asian smuggling networks

Look at the timing of the two reports.

On November 8, the very day the Jensen Huang scandal broke, The New York Times published an investigation for which its reporters went in person to dozens of Chinese companies that the US Commerce Department had approved to handle Nvidia's H200 chips. New Matrix in Beijing was one of them. According to the report, the registered addresses of companies approved to buy the chips turned out to be empty "ghost offices," and some of the companies had close ties to entities on US sanctions lists and to firms under contract with the Chinese military.

One exposé says Nvidia's CEO was having an affair with a female spy from Megaspeed, the Singapore company that handled the chip smuggling. The other says the Chinese companies Commerce approved to buy H200s are nothing but shell companies trading on behalf of the Chinese military. The aim of these two reports is clear. They are meant to pressure the Trump administration and the Commerce Department into fully revoking or freezing H200 export approvals for China and, going further, to force a sweeping overhaul of the loophole that let chips be diverted through data centers run by third parties in Singapore and elsewhere in Southeast Asia.

The third cut: Put Nvidia on a national security leash through congressional oversight and an independent investigation

As the world's largest company by market cap and the dominant force in AI, Nvidia has until now enjoyed broad autonomy in how it runs its business. But in the wake of this incident, the three congressional committees responsible for China, foreign affairs, and intelligence have begun examining Nvidia's internal security measures directly. They have even pressured Nvidia's board into forming an independent investigation committee to look into the company's own founder and CEO.

In effect, Washington's national security establishment has planted a watchdog right inside Nvidia's board. From now on, the goal is to make sure that everything, down to where each and every one of Nvidia's high performance chips ends up, conforms strictly to US national security strategy. It also means there is no more room for skirting the edge of the rules or releasing chips with specs specially tailored to regulatory thresholds.

Conclusion

"The scandal was a detonator set off right on cue. The real goal was to plug the holes chips were leaking through."

Jensen Huang made the fatal mistake of letting his guard down in his private life and personal relationships. In the end, he fell into a honey trap, the textbook tactic of intelligence warfare, and was compromised. America's national security and intelligence agencies ruthlessly exploited the weakness his private life had exposed. As a result, they solved three thorny problems in a single stroke: Nvidia's lobbying at the White House to ease restrictions on China, the flow of H200 chips into Chinese shell companies, and smuggling routed through Singapore.

The closed congressional hearing set for November 18 will be the decisive turning point at which the US moves in earnest to tighten its sanctions on China's AI compute even further.
View quoted post on X
Alexander PCs @AlexanderPCS
Yikes.
Pirat_Nation 🔴 Verified account @Pirat_Nation 1d
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has admitted to cheating on his wife after revealing he had an affair with Alice Huang, an executive now at the centre of a suspected Chinese spying case.

US intelligence officials suspect Alice Huang of working for China’s Ministry of State Security to gather information about Nvidia.

The company’s board has launched an independent investigation. Huang apologised to his wife, children and employees, saying:

“I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry.”

“I take full responsibility for what I did and the hurt I caused.”
View quoted post on X
Alexander PCs @AlexanderPCS
Need to say this, so buckle up. Chips will fall where they might, but with all the talk about the issue this past week, the record needs to be completely straight about something:

The belief that human life begins at conception is not actually a “belief” at all. It is a demonstrable, inalienable, unassailable scientific fact that is beyond any dispute or argument. It is not contingent on anyone’s political leanings or philosophical framing.

1) Not only is the “zygote” alive at the point of conception, both the male sperm and the female egg meet the biological definition of “alive” before conception even occurs. Both are living human cells made of human tissue, containing human DNA. When those two living cells combine, conception initiates the development of an entirely new human organism from reproductive cells that are already living.

2) Cellular metabolism, biological organization, capacity for growth and development - all the biological criteria of “human life” are present.

3) The living genetic material is human. It belongs to the species Homo sapiens, not any other species.

4) It is a biologically distinct human organism with a new, unique combination of DNA that is different from either parent. It is an integrated and developing biological entity as opposed to an isolated cell type.

5) It will develop continuously given suitable environmental conditions. It will progress through embryonic, fetal, infant, adolescent, mature adult, and elderly stages without ever changing species.

So, biology is absolutely not against anyone who argues that, from the point of conception, the human zygote is:

- Alive
- Biologically human
- A developing human organism

No biologist will dispute any of this. The question surrounding abortion is, and has always been a *legal* one not a biological one. And that question isn’t whether or not it’s alive, or human. It’s whether or not it constitutes a legal person with moral and legal rights.

The political opinion, or religious belief, or philosophical position or whatever you wanna call it that all human life is worthy of legal personhood and legal rights and protections at the point of conception is a mainstream viewpoint shared by billions of people of various faiths and politics across the world. It’s not some fringe position based purely on religious preferences and teachings with no scientific evidence to support the position.

The idea that someone who holds this viewpoint is some sort of religious extremist or misogynist or unscientific simpleton needs to be completely crushed. This is a mainstream, rational opinion grounded in both science and morality. You don’t have to agree with it, but mocking it makes you look like an intolerant jerk.
31 replies 134 reposts 923 likes 20K views View on X