Annals of Internal Medicine’s specialty collections include research, reviews, and expert opinion on topics ranging from cardiology to prevention efforts. View our specialty collections here: bit.ly/4qKVaX4
Annals of Int Med
Verified account This account is verified. Learn more@AnnalsofIM
Annals publishes content to inform medical professionals and society, advance standards of medical research, and improve the health of people worldwide.
2.8K Following 74K Followers 15K Posts
Latest posts 5
I.M. Matters News recently spoke with S. Ryan Greysen, MD, MHS, about how hospital medicine has evolved in the past 30 years and where it's headed next. Read here: bit.ly/48AG935
Hospital medicine emerged 30 years ago in response to changing hospitals and increasing patient complexity. In a new commentary, S. Ryan Greysen, MD, MHS, and Robert M. Wachter, MD, MHM, discuss the evolution of the field of #HospitalMedicine from early success to new challenges. bit.ly/48Geca1
A new @AnnalsofIMCC case report highlights the importance of early diagnosis, isolation, and public health notification as measles reemerges in the United States. Clinicians can use this new Annals #InTheClinic feature to stay abreast of the latest evidence on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of measles. Read here: bit.ly/4BRtnLg
www.acpjournals.org Measles | Annals of Internal Medicine Measles is reemerging, with cases and outbreaks increasing across the United States and other countries where measles had previously been eliminated. Most U.S. physicians have no experience with... A 70-year-old woman developed #measles after international travel despite presumed immunity based on age and a reported history of childhood infection. Measles is often considered a childhood disease, but clinicians should remain vigilant in adults presenting with fever, rash, and recent travel history, especially as the disease reemerges in the U.S. Read the full text for free: bit.ly/4iWlrR8 @AgostinaVelo @AHAScience #AHAJournalsView quoted post on X
Proposed federal grant rule changes from the Office of Management and Budget could significantly reshape how federal research grants are awarded. The revisions would allow political appointees to approve grants based on their alignment with the administration’s priorities rather than on scientific merit. An analysis published in Annals of Internal Medicine of 3,653 public organizational comments on this proposed rule change found that nearly 88% of organizations opposed the revisions. @ACPIMPhysicians was among the organizations expressing concern, stating that the proposed revision opens the door to politicizing public health and scientific decision making. Read the full analysis for free here: bit.ly/3UcD4Ty
