Twitxy Saved

AukeHoekstra

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@AukeHoekstra

@aukehoekstra.bsky.social Debunking scare stories about electric vehicles and renewable energy. Director NEONresearch.nl @TUeindhoven. Founder Zenmo.com.
Joined October 2008
263 Following 51K Followers 69K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

AukeHoekstra Verified account @AukeHoekstra
Thread with tweets I refer to often.

First my studies showing EVs are really much better

Article Joule x.com/AukeHoekstra/s…

CO2 study with Prof Steinbuch avere.org/wp-content/upl…

Us in Der Spiegel x.com/AukeHoekstra/s…

Transport & Environment tool
x.com/AukeHoekstra/s…
AukeHoekstra Verified account @AukeHoekstra Apr 20, 2020
What I like best is that they are very very transparent. I always look at the annex with underlying assumptions and here I think it is well written, short but exhaustive and accurate. transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files…
View quoted post on X
AukeHoekstra Verified account @AukeHoekstra
The growth of batteries at 40% a year is not so much incredible as remarkably predictable.
Nevertheless it's great to see this prerequisite for replacing fossil fuels fall into place. And if there is one place AI can do a lot of good, it's in battery development.
Erik Solheim Verified account @ErikSolheim 6d
This is simply incredible, CATL, the world’s largest battery maker, will reach 1 terrawatt this year!

That is nearly as much power as the entire grid in the US. Or double the Indian grid or eight times the grid in the UK.

CATL last year shipped 661 gigawatt of batteries. This year its expects to reach 1 terrawatt.

CATL produces 39% of the world’s electric car batteries and 30% of batteries for energy storage.

Hardly any company contributes more to the green transition than CATL. It was founded 25 years ago by Robin Zeng to create jobs for the people of his small hometown of Ningde in southern China. I visited the impressive headquarters a couple of years ago.

But the giant eyes even higher. At a show in Shanghai last week Robin Zeng said that: “We are still not good enough”.

We are for example not able to pack a big jet with batteries.

Robin Zeng believes the next battery revolution will be powered by artificial intelligence:

* AI accelerates material discovery - moving into sodium, solid state batteries and many new and exciting materials.

* AI converts scientific knowledge into higher performing battery designs.

* AI improves manufacturing - analyzes data and makes decisions in real time.
View quoted post on X
9 replies 55 reposts 325 likes 7.7K views View on X
AukeHoekstra Verified account @AukeHoekstra
20 yrs ago I found that PV, wind, EVs, batteries and heat pumps were predictably and reliably on route to replace finite, dirty and expensive fossil fuels. Wrights law is the way to predict how fast. Innovation helps a lot more than rationing and more focus should be on that.
Laurent Segalen Verified account @MegaWattXinfo Nov 2
For almost two decades, the environmental movement has repeatedly announced the demise of fossil fuels. The headlines have been dramatic, but the results have been less convincing.

As @turkiyecop31 is about to begin, the world remains remarkably indifferent — despite the climate crisis growing ever more urgent — as if saving the planet were merely an optional item on the agenda.
@gerardreid14 and I invite @CampanaleMark , founder of @CarbonBubble. Carbon Tracker is the financial think tank that brought the concepts of unburnable carbon and the carbon bubble into mainstream debate. Its research has helped investors understand the risks of fossil-fuel investments but has also been politically weaponised by the Greens.

A decade ago, the debate centred on stranded assets, carbon budgets and the prospect that fossil-fuel reserves would become economically unviable. Today, our thinking is increasingly aligned with perspectives associated with @ember_energy and @MLiebreich, emphasising technology, economics and the practical realities of the energy transition.

We probably are witnessing a schism between former allies: the “Climate Movement” and “The Clean Energy community”. We believe technology, innovation and economics will do more to accelerate the transition than verbose toothless international accords or poorly designed top-down government policies.

Carbon Tracker deserves credit for making climate risk a serious financial issue. However, forecasts about the timing of peak fossil-fuel demand have proved less reliable. Oil demand rebounded after COVID-19, while geopolitical instability and energy-security concerns have demonstrated the resilience of hydrocarbons.

The question is whether the carbon-focused approach remains relevant or whether it is approaching obsolescence.

Environmental campaigners have advocated carbon taxes for decades, arguing that polluters should pay for emissions and that revenues should fund the transition to cleaner energy. But what if the world already has a de facto carbon tax, imposed not by environmental policy but by geopolitical conflicts? Wars, supply disruptions and decisions by powerful governments can drive up the price of oil and gas, imposing enormous costs on households and businesses.
Russia under Putin, Iran under the Ayatollahs and the United States under Trump illustrate how geopolitical decisions can reshape global energy markets.

Carbon Tracker helped establish stranded-asset risk as a serious capital-markets concern. Its central warning—that some fossil-fuel investments could lose value as the energy system evolves—remains relevant.

But the timing of the transition has proved difficult to predict. Fossil-fuel demand has shown greater resilience than some forecasts anticipated, while geopolitics, affordability and energy security have complicated the path towards decarbonisation.

The distinction is important: identifying investments at risk is not the same as predicting the imminent collapse of fossil-fuel demand.

Our conversation was robust, with both sides standing their ground. We left with a sense that the debate needs to move beyond political targets and increasingly outdated assumptions towards the realities of technology, economics and capital allocation.

We may agree on the destination, but the real argument is about the pathway.
View quoted post on X