Behav. Brain. Sci.

@BBSJournal

Behavioral & Brain Sciences (est 1978). Publisher = @CambridgeUP, ed. @paulbloomatyale & @neuro425. RT/like =|= editorial endorsement. Tweets by @joseph_fridman

cambridge.org/bbs Joined December 2013

3.8K Following 7.9K Followers 2.2K Posts

Latest posts 5

Behav. Brain. Sci. @BBSJournal Oct 18

“…language models do not replace linguistic theories, but they do tell us things about language, and they do force us to rethink certain approaches.”

— Richard Futrell & Kyle Mahowald

cambridge.org/core/journals/…

www.cambridge.org You can’t fight in here! This is BBS! | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core You can’t fight in here! This is BBS! - Volume 49

Behav. Brain. Sci. @BBSJournal Oct 17

“Knowledge incubated within the peer group can act as a cultural safety net, called upon when adult knowledge is insufficient.”

— Sheina Lew-Levy & Dorsa Amir

cambridge.org/core/journals/…

www.cambridge.org Children as agents of cultural adaptation | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core Children as agents of cultural adaptation - Volume 49

Behav. Brain. Sci. @BBSJournal Oct 16

“Do we need both a mentalistic and an institutional stance?”

“The institutional stance” by Julian Jara-Ettinger & Yarrow Dunham (@yarrowdunham). Full BBS treatment, with commentaries and authors’ response:

cambridge.org/core/journals/…

www.cambridge.org The institutional stance | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core The institutional stance - Volume 49

Behav. Brain. Sci. @BBSJournal Oct 15

“Indeed, specifically social tinkering may be uniquely human.”

“Social tinkering: The social foundations of cultural complexity” by @NickJChater & @MH_Christiansen. Full BBS treatment, with commentaries and authors’ response:

cambridge.org/core/journals/…

www.cambridge.org Social tinkering: The social foundations of cultural complexity | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |... Social tinkering: The social foundations of cultural complexity - Volume 49

Behav. Brain. Sci. @BBSJournal Oct 14

Does egalitarianism require equality?

“Egalitarianism is not equality: Moving from outcome to process in the study of human political organisation” by Stibbard-Hawkes & von Rueden. Full BBS treatment, with commentaries and authors’ response:

cambridge.org/core/journals/…

www.cambridge.org Egalitarianism is not equality: Moving from outcome to process in the study of human political... Egalitarianism is not equality: Moving from outcome to process in the study of human political organisation - Volume 49