DaiWW

Although I'm speaking up for Jensen Huang, from China's perspective, Huang being stripped of his role as Nvidia's CEO is obviously a good thing.

To Nvidia, Jensen Huang is like Steve Jobs was to Apple. After losing Jobs, Apple clearly lost its creativity—it became just a conventional manufacturing company with excellent marketing capabilities, and that's the core reason why Chinese phone companies like Huawei and Xiaomi have been able to surpass Apple. After Nvidia loses Jensen Huang, it is expected to follow a similar trajectory and lose its creativity, and Chinese chip companies may in the coming years achieve global leadership just as they did in the phone industry.

In addition, Huang's experience will clearly serve as a wake-up call for every Chinese person working in the United States, especially those in the AI industry—and Chinese people make up half of the U.S. AI workforce. Remember, even someone as influential as Jensen Huang ultimately finds it hard to protect his wealth from white people plunder—let alone you.

In the U.S., all those rich people go to Epstein Island to rape underage girls and eat children, yet these people get away with everything. Jensen Huang merely has a mistress, and he's being forced to resign. This is obviously those white bastards in America trying to seize control of Nvidia. Huang only holds 3.58% of Nvidia's stock; he has always controlled the company through his immense prestige, and those white bastards have surely been coveting Nvidia for a long time.

Huang's mistress is obviously not a spy—she's just a chip middleman who, through her relationship with Huang, buys large quantities of Nvidia chips and then resells them to Chinese companies to make money. Even if she were a spy, the CIA should arrest her, and only after a court trial and conviction could that be used as grounds to demand Huang's resignation. But there have been no legal proceedings at all—those white bastards in America can't wait to swallow up Nvidia, this massive asset.

This is essentially plunder. Those white bastards will use every means to plunder the assets of Chinese and Russians in Western society. Chinese and Russians are not allowed to acquire massive wealth in the West. Frankly, I don't sympathize with people like Jensen Huang either. They believed in America's so-called freedom, democracy, and rule of law, but failed to see through the predatory, barbaric nature ingrained in white people. They are naive and foolish—this is the path they chose for themselves, and they must bear the consequences today.

I accidentally deleted this post, so I'm posting it again.

Facts have already proven that ethnic Chinese can never own huge money in Western society. First it was Zhao Changpeng, then it was Jensen Huang—when Chinese people make a fortune in Western society, they get targeted, and those white people start thinking up all kinds of legal or illegal ways to plunder your assets. North Korean hackers, Chinese spies......they'll come up with all sorts of pretexts. What's even more terrifying is that this kind of plundering is in fact tacitly accepted throughout Western society.

This is actually determined by the barbaric nature of white people. Over the past few thousand years, they have fundamentally been a predatory, barbaric people. For the past few thousand years, they have been eating disgusting food, growing ugly beards, and living in low wooden huts. They are not good at building things themselves at all, but they are keen on plundering one another on the European continent or at sea. After the Industrial Revolution, these robbers invented advanced weapons, which enabled them to go around the world plundering and bringing endless disaster to the world. After China's rise, on the physical level, these white barbarian have lost the possibility of plundering the East, but when it comes to those Chinese people making money in Western society, they still cannot suppress their own predatory nature, letting these naive Asian billionaires experience what true Western civilization is.

Hong Kong also has plenty of fools who are just like Singapore's — extremely pro-Western, arrogant and stupid, looking down on mainland Chinese. But they are not China's enemies, because in essence their interests align with China's: the financial growth brought by China's rise can benefit both — for example, RMB internationalization or Chinese companies' overseas IPOs. So although these Hong Kong fools are ideological enemies, because of the common interests, their ideology will be gradually influenced and corrected.

Singapore is different. Singapore has little common interest with China; on the contrary, it is a direct competitor to China in shipping and finance. Add to that the ideological divergence, then mutual hostility is bound to accumulate.

Toward enemies, there is no room for soft-heartedness. I suggest China can start by investigating Singapore's role in hiding and laundering dirty money from China and Southeast Asia. The United States has already set a good example for China by going after Switzerland.

Vietnam has long aspired to become a developed country, and its recent economic growth rate has been quite high, at 8–9%. However, I do not believe Vietnam can achieve this goal.

1. To date, the developed economies of the world can be broadly divided into three types by industry. The first is the industrial power, with its own leading technologies—for example, Japan, South Korea, Germany, the United States in the past, and China today. The second is the country with abundant natural resources, such as Saudi Arabia or Qatar. The third is the small economy that, relying on its special geographical location, can develop finance serving the globe—for example, Hong Kong or Singapore.

Vietnam has no resources and no advanced financial sector, so it clearly cannot become another Saudi Arabia or Singapore. But Vietnam's technology has no noteworthy progress to speak of. To this day, Vietnam remains a giant assembly factory. In all high-tech fields—AI, new energy, robotics, semiconductors, commercial spaceflight, and so on—Vietnam is a nobody. Technology and capital are in the hands of foreign manufacturers. Even VinFast, Vietnam's pride, sources 80–90% of its components from China. In the foreseeable future, there is no visible possibility of any major technological progress in Vietnam.

2. To date, the developed economies of the world can also be divided into two types by race. One is those built by white people: the European countries, the United States, and Canada. The other is those built by East Asians: Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

Although Vietnam has always called itself an East Asian country, the only reason is that Vietnam was once part of China. From a racial perspective, the Vietnamese are not an East Asian people. To put it precisely, they are people of transition from East Asians to Southeast Asians. Compared with Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, the Vietnamese do not have a lower IQ, and this is also a reason why I am not optimistic about Vietnam's future technological development.

3. People say that Vietnam can replicate China's development path: first do assembly, then gradually develop its own technology and build its own industries. But this path is no longer viable under the new technological conditions. Vietnamese workers today must compete with the large numbers of robots in Chinese factories. These robots do not rest 24 hours a day, have a zero error rate, and have lower overall costs than Vietnamese workers. This is why low-end industries such as clothing are in fact still largely produced in China.

4. The main reason Vietnam's GDP is currently growing fast is that its base is very low. Vietnam's per capita GDP is only about 5,000 US dollars at present. In fact, if you look at the Vietnamese economy, its GDP comes mainly from a booming real estate sector, finance (serving the domestic market), and services, and these industries will not turn a country into a developed country. I expect that when Vietnam's per capita GDP reaches around 10,000 US dollars, it will begin to stagnate and remain stuck in the middle-income trap for a long time. In the future, Vietnam will gradually have to accept a transition of its national economy toward one dominated by services like Tailand.