Twitxy Saved

Brodemort, "He Who Must Not Be Named" β˜¦πŸ‡»πŸ‡¦

@Brosephos

ByzCath | Protestant Boogeyman πŸ§Ÿβ€β™‚οΈ | Bleeblerblerblerbelrb @lex_ludendi 🫦 | We are all @Brosephos 🍻 so join the Discord discord.gg/B2SRxW3HV
Georgia, USA linktr.ee/Brosephos Joined May 2009
905 Following 3.5K Followers 106K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Brodemort, "He Who Must Not Be Named" β˜¦πŸ‡»πŸ‡¦ @Brosephos
Of all the fields to plagiarize in, NT studies might be the worstβ€”we are obsessed with analyzing source dependence (e.g., the Synoptic problem).

@WesleyLHuff is attempting to distract you in his apology. His reply to @maklelan is bad. Here's my analysis.

youtu.be/eZaktN2Uusw?is…
www.youtube.com Response to Wes Huff's Video on Plagiarism I go over how this is not an apology. Wes never addresses the claim...
12 replies 8 reposts 67 likes 8.2K views View on X
Brodemort, "He Who Must Not Be Named" β˜¦πŸ‡»πŸ‡¦ @Brosephos
The papers weren't just bad. They were plagiarized. And there is clear evidence he has plagiarized in his MA and PhD work.
He has also stolen social media posts.

This is who @WesleyLHuff is, a plagiarizer.

He's lying in his video, and everyone should call him out.
Protestia Verified account @Protestia 2h
A brief CUT of apologist Wes Huff addressing plagiarism concerns.

"All of the papers I put on academia.edu almost a decade ago are bad. Their use of citation and attribution is problematic. They're not well written. They're all pretty bad."

See full video below:
View quoted post on X
4 replies 4 reposts 33 likes 795 views View on X
Brodemort, "He Who Must Not Be Named" β˜¦πŸ‡»πŸ‡¦ @Brosephos
Still defending a plagiarizer, I see.

It goes from his MA up to his PhD work & online content.

@WesleyLHuff is not an academic or a scholar. He admits he has no publications
He is an evangelical, distrustful "apologist."

Let's see the final paper and compare it w/ the "draft."
Jon Steel Verified account @bigjonsteel 21h
After listening to @WesleyLHuff’s response, I have to wonder why @maklelan, a self proclaimed Christian and fellow scholar, didn’t approach Wes privately first.

Maybe he did. I can’t know that for certain.

But Dan has been making content long enough to know exactly what happens when you publicly criticize someone. His video wasn’t merely an attempt to correct a fellow scholar. It seems to be an attempt at a public execution
View quoted post on X
12 replies 5 reposts 98 likes 2K views View on X