Twitxy Saved

Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@Fibonacci_HFT

Helping Web3 founders launch, grow, and stay liquid. Precision market making | Smart capital | Trusted by tier-1 builders.
On-chain Fibonacci.market Joined August 2023
60 Following 6.6K Followers 1.6K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund Verified account @Fibonacci_HFT
๐Ÿ”ธ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ถ โ€” ๐—™๐˜‚๐—น๐—น-๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€

โ€ข Real-time dashboard: track liquidity, PnL, order flow, sentiment
โ€ข 1000+ projectsโ€™ expertise, real PnL-positive MM strategies
โ€ข HFT engine, 99% uptime, active market execution
โ€ข Advanced tokenomics & fundraising tools pre-TGE
โ€ข Full analytics, mobile app, and CEX integrations

๐Ÿ”น Every metric you need, all in one place.

๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐Ÿ‘‡
0:27
24 replies 9 reposts 68 likes 17K views View on X
Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund Verified account @Fibonacci_HFT
๐Ÿ”ธ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ: ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ท๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐˜€

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ

Token unlocks are often misunderstood. The risk isn't just "more supply entering the market"โ€”it's the sudden, concentrated shock to the order book. When a major VC or team cliff unlocks, it creates a "liquidity cliff," where the sudden volume of sell orders overwhelms the existing bid depth.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต

Inexperienced token teams try to artificially prop up the price by injecting treasury capital directly into the bids. This simply provides exit liquidity for early investors at the expense of the project's runway. Itโ€™s a costly and unsustainable defense.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ'๐˜€ ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต

Professional execution desks manage unlocks differently. Instead of fighting the trend, we dynamically widen spreads to account for the asymmetric risk and utilize algorithmic inventory rebalancing. By staggering bids across multiple price levels and routing volume through deep OTC channels, we absorb the selling pressure smoothly rather than hitting a sudden wall.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†

An unlock should be a liquidity event, not a liquidity crisis. Prepare your order books before the cliff hits.
6 replies 0 reposts 48 likes 3.6K views View on X
Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund Verified account @Fibonacci_HFT
๐Ÿ”ธ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ฒ

One asset, two books, two settlement paths, and a much larger coordination surface.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜

- quote bands
- clip sizing
- hedge routes
- wallet balances
- escalation paths

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

If inventory, transfers, or risk limits drift between venues, coverage can look wider on paper than it feels in the book.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€

The second venue should widen access, not split decision-making across disconnected tools.

See how we structure coverage: fibonacci.market
10 replies 5 reposts 41 likes 3.9K views View on X
Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund Verified account @Fibonacci_HFT
๐Ÿ”ธ ๐—œ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ โ€” ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜๐—•๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—š_๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€

Only part of your size is displayed (icebergQty). The rest refreshes as it fills.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ โ€œ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€โ€ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€

ICEBERG_PARTS = ceil(totalQty / icebergQty). It caps how many refreshes your order can have.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

Too many parts โ†’ order rejected. Too few parts โ†’ more size shown per refresh โ†’ more information leakage.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ

Pick icebergQty so parts stay well under the limit, then test on the exact symbol filters from /exchangeInfo.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†

Icebergs are a visibility tool, not a liquidity generator. Treat parts limits like any other venue parameter in your bot config.
14 replies 0 reposts 42 likes 4.3K views View on X
Fibonacci Capital - Market Maker & HFT Fund Verified account @Fibonacci_HFT
๐Ÿ”ธ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ผ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ โ€” ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—›๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—•๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป

Bitcoin is trading near $80.7K at the time of writing, still inside a broad $78Kโ€“$84K range after repeated tests of the lower boundary. The market looks calmer than the October sweeps, though the setup still leans on selective absorption rather than broad expansion.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ

โ€” BTC spot at the time of writing: ~$80.7K
โ€” Working range: $78Kโ€“$84K
โ€” Structural cost bases watched: ~$77.9K (True Market Mean) and ~$81.5K (ETF cost basis)
โ€” Overhead supply remains concentrated above $84K
โ€” Recent sweeps below $81.3K have not produced a clean break

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ

ETF flows have been mixed, with earlier outflows partially offset by smaller inflows. Bids near $80K on major books have thinned after the latest sweep and shifted lower. The tape shows absorption at the lows, but not yet a sustained expansion in participation.

๐Ÿ”น ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

Perpetual open interest has largely reset from the early-October spike. Options pricing into the 30 October expiry still implies a contained range, with downside hedging active around the lower half of the band. The market is not levered aggressively in either direction, but it remains sensitive to a break of the range lows.