Twitxy Saved

Founder Mode

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@Founder_Mode_

a running archive of the chronically locked in. by @armaanSkooner
Joined May 2021
53 Following 169K Followers 20K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Founder Mode Verified account @Founder_Mode_
When Jony Ive designed the first iMac, he put a handle on it.

Not so people could carry it, it was a desktop computer. Nobody was going to carry it anywhere.

Steve Jobs insisted on it anyway.

Manufacturing a recessed handle cost a fortune. Every engineer at the old Apple would have killed it.

Ive explained why it mattered: "Back then, people weren't comfortable with technology. If you're scared of something, you won't touch it. If there's a handle on it, it makes a relationship possible. It gives you permission to touch."

A handle changed how people felt about approaching a computer.

Elon thinks the same way.

Early Tesla engineers would describe him stopping meetings over a panel gap, a surface ratio, a curve that didn't feel right... Things that had nothing to do with range or performance.

He'd just say it's not beautiful enough and refuse to move on.

Most people assume Jobs and Musk are opposites, one sold dreams, the other sells engineering.

The overlap is that both understood something most builders never figure out: "The way a product makes you feel when you look at it is part of how it works."
David Senra Verified account @davidsenra May 20
.@EricJorgenson on why Steve Jobs and @elonmusk are more similar than people realize:

"I think Elon is underrated in his design sense. There's a lot of times when you hear Elon quotes that sound exactly like Steve Jobs would've said.

He thinks about it like an algorithm. There's certain things, ratios that have to exist between the product, or it needs to feel bigger on the inside than it looks on the outside — that he just absolutely insists on.

There's stories, especially from early Tesla, of him being unreasonable about design decisions that he just puts a finger on, and is like, 'It has to be this way or it's not good enough, it's not beautiful enough, it's not aesthetic enough.'

In the same way that Steve Jobs was very much like, 'No, put a handle on that computer, because it changes the relationship that somebody has with this kind of new, foreign machine.'"
View quoted post on X
38 replies 46 reposts 564 likes 248K views View on X
Founder Mode Verified account @Founder_Mode_
Who does Sam Altman call when he’s stuck on a problem with no obvious answer?

Two people: Paul Graham & Peter Thiel.

He says they’re the two he has learned the most from across different phases of his career. After years of looking, he still hasn’t found anyone else who can think in a truly non-consensus way and stay right.

He describes what a call with them looks like. You arrive with three options and ask which to pick. They tell you none of the three is good, then hand you a fourth that seems obvious the second you hear it.

Graham picked him to run Y Combinator in 2014, when he was 28. Altman is now running OpenAI and still calls the same two people.
1:00
2 replies 5 reposts 73 likes 13K views View on X
Founder Mode Verified account @Founder_Mode_
Travis Kalanick (ex @Uber CEO) says chasing the safe, agreeable idea is the FASTEST way to lose.

He says if you are not fighting for the best idea, then what idea are you fighting for, the mediocre one?

At Uber, the strongest idea won every time, no matter who it came from or how uncomfortable it made the room.

Comfort and consensus are where great companies go to die, he says.
0:36
3 replies 16 reposts 112 likes 8.2K views View on X
Founder Mode Verified account @Founder_Mode_
In 1927 Warner Bros. was close to bankruptcy when it bet on sound. Every other studio thought talkies were a gimmick, partly because the equipment was brutally expensive and partly because silent film already worked.

What changed the calculus wasn't audiences wanting sound. It was the cost of producing it falling far enough that a studio could use it everywhere instead of once.

AI video is sitting at that line. The quality is there, but running it live costs too much to leave on, so avatars get used for pre-rendered clips rather than conversation.

Atmee v2 claims up to 50x faster and 100x cheaper than leading video models. At that price you stop rationing it. An avatar can just stay running… a kiosk outside a shop, a tutor, a character you call.

Capability decides what's possible. Cost decides what gets built.
1:15
Chen-Ping Yu Verified account @yuchenping 4d
After Google acquired my AR startup, I started thinking about the next interface, this time for AI. Text and voice work fine, just like DOS did before the Mac. But nothing’s more intuitive than face to face.

After two years of research, today we’re launching Atmee v2: a real-time avatar model that makes live video agents feel truly life-like.

• Any character from 1 image + 10s of audio
• Contextual expressions, gestures, even interacting with the environment
• Live video calls, voice only, or video generation

At its core, Atmee v2 is a video foundation model, it can render anything, but it’s built to excel at characters, which is what video models like Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 are mostly used for. In comparison:
Atmee v2

• Up to 50x faster
• 10-100x cheaper

Build tutors, sales coaches, support agents, companions, game characters, even whole living worlds. The interface after text and voice starts today.
View quoted post on X
0 replies 1 reposts 9 likes 3.5K views View on X
Founder Mode Verified account @Founder_Mode_
Elon Musk says weekly skip-level meetings keep him from getting GLAZED.

“I have these very detailed engineering reviews weekly.”

In a skip-level review, the person who reports to him doesn’t give the update. Everyone who reports to that person does.

And there can’t be advance preparation.

“Otherwise you’re going to get glazed, as I say these days.”

Glazed means sugarcoated. Give people time to prepare and the update comes out polished. Ask cold and there is nothing to polish.

How does he stop people from preparing?

“I just go around the room. Everyone provides an update.”

Some reviews run twice a week. The AI5 chip review is Tuesdays and Saturdays, usually two or three hours.

Meeting that often gives him a snapshot of what each person said last time, so he can plot the points on a curve.

“Are we converging to a solution or not?”

He takes drastic action only when he concludes success is not in the set of possible outcomes.

For Starlink, he said that conclusion came in 2018.
1:09