Frances Widdowson

This account is verified. Learn more

@FrancesWiddows1

Wrongfully terminated @MountRoyalU prof. Support my fundraiser so that I can do more documentaries on the #Kamloops215Deception - fundrazr.com/52XKmf.

Joined September 2018

58 Following 14K Followers 4.1K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 Jul 15, 2025

You can watch the initial feature length investigative documentary that I co-directed with Simon Hergott, "What Remains: Exposing the Kamloops #MassGraveDeception's Impact on Powell River", here - youtu.be/PE6OEpz0xyQ. We want to do more work on the perpetuation of falsehoods!

Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 4h

Unhappy Hour - Q and A - Fifteen Facts about the Kamloops 215 Deception youtube.com/live/ZrErGZPbw… via @YouTube - Live at 4:30 pm. Alberta Time.

www.youtube.com Unhappy Hour - Q and A - Fifteen Facts about the Kamloops 215... Frances Widdowson will answer questions about her compilation of fa...

Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 7h

Is it being argued that @SFUArchaeology found "grave shafts" and a clay layer in 2002? George Nicholas' report does not state this.

As @tkemlups has repeatedly provided false information, the Kamloops Indian Band is not a reliable source.

maes howe @ManonRaven 10h

@FrancesWiddows1 @Tkemlups @SFUArchaeology NO

Methodology is always reviewed & was sound

Green got email confirmation

SFU test pits inadvertently validated the grave shafts & clay layer detected

Total # of graves is currently irrelevant on 2/160 acres & work ongoing

x3 HRDD, LiDAR etc is triangulated data & is sound

View quoted post on X

Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 11h

Sarah Beaulieu detected 15 false positives with her GPR survey in the @tkemlups apple orchard where @SFUArchaeology's George Nicholas did an excavation in 2002. This requires a re-evaluation of the methodology for determining the other 200 "probable burials"/"grave shafts".

maes howe @ManonRaven 12h

@CurrieMica @FrancesWiddows1 @Tkemlups No

AGAIN:

Grave shafts IS the technical archaeological term for ‘probable graves’ in this context AS DESCRIBED

+25 distinct GPR signals, morphology, Sliceview etc are unique to graves NOT utilities, roots, rocks etc

A ‘dig/remains’ is NOT required to prove existence of graves

View quoted post on X

Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 23h

x.com/i/grok/share/1…