Twitxy Saved

HackerEarth

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@HackerEarth

πŸ‘©πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’»Great tech teams are built here
San Francisco hackerearth.com Joined October 2012
1.4K Following 27K Followers 21K Posts

Latest posts 5

HackerEarth Verified account @HackerEarth
AI can generate code. But who decides whether that code is good enough to ship?

That's becoming an important question for engineering teams.

Companies increasingly need developers who can do more than write code with AI.

They need people who can:
- Review AI-generated code.
- Spot errors and security risks.
- Validate outputs.
- Make sound technical decisions.

The value of an engineer isn't just in the code they produce. It's in the judgment they bring to it.

And that's changing what technical hiring needs to evaluate.
HackerEarth Verified account @HackerEarth
AI fluency isn't about knowing how to prompt.

It's about knowing how to think alongside AI.

- Can you question its suggestions?
- Spot flawed reasoning?
- Recognize when an answer looks right but isn't?
- Know when to accept, reject, or improve what AI produces?

As AI becomes part of everyday work, the ability to evaluate its output matters as much as the ability to use it.

The real skill isn't just using AI. It's knowing what to do with what AI produces.
HackerEarth Verified account @HackerEarth
The biggest problem with AI hiring isn't AI.

It's using new technology to solve old hiring problems.

Faster interviews don't necessarily mean better hiring.

If we're still evaluating candidates on the wrong skills, we're just making the wrong decisions faster.

The real value of AI in hiring isn't just speed.
It's helping companies make more informed, skills-based hiring decisions.

Because better hiring starts with better evaluation.

What's your take?