Twitxy Saved

Cuth

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@ItsCuthulhu

tinkering | Analytics Grad & Analytics Lead
@georgiatech
Philadelphia, PA jakecuth.com Joined March 2026
184 Following 620 Followers 4.4K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Cuth Verified account @ItsCuthulhu
NEW SOTA DECISION MODEL: SubQ Snap

SubQ Snap absolutely crushed the S1 Bench, beating Jev!! Insane.

1,999 decisions, 0 errors. Macro accuracy 0.825, the best full run the bench has ever recorded. Jev scores 0.775. Mercury Decide, the previous best API model, scores 0.802.

Subset scores: paws 0.940, vitaminc 0.917, boolq 0.910, massive 0.909, aegis2 0.856. Only helpsteer2 lags at 0.416, and that subset drags everyone down. To be fair, none of the other decision models do well on helpsteer2... And it seems to have done better than Jev.

Subquadratic claimed 61.7 vs Jev's 57.9 on their own Decision Index. On an independent battery it is not even that close. It beat its own benchmarks by a lot.

It didn't hit the speed benchmark on my bench but the accuracy more than makes up for it. About a second per decision, and the entire 1,999-question battery cost roughly 3 cents of input tokens, output free. To be fair, I felt it was the fastest but my agent said it was a bit slower. Nevertheless, this is the SOTA decision model.

Hosted API only and still a preview model, so the open questions are weights and what the 384K context does on long inputs. But as a decision model, this is the new bar.

This is my new go to decision model.

Full results: bench.jakecuth.com

subq.ai
Cuth Verified account @ItsCuthulhu
New result: decision-2-0-lux (9b) finished my decision-model bench and it came up short of Jev.

It scored 74 out of 100 across 1,999 real decisions, with no errors. Jev scores 78/100, so it trails by 3 points.

Best at judging which answer helps more. Weakest at not getting fooled by look-alike sentences.
It is slower, about one decision every 8 seconds.
Size: 9b parameters, fits one spark with room to spare.

Full table: bench.jakecuth.com
Cuth Verified account @ItsCuthulhu
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS: The #5 model on the intelligence board just lapped the field when the race turned to speed.

The video races the Artificial Analysis top 10 to 10,000 tokens on one clock. Claude Opus 5.5 Max scores 2.2 points ahead of GPT-6 Astra Max and generates at 115.4 tokens a second against 37.7. It finishes the race while Astra is still a third of the way there.

The score gap is small. The speed gap is the story.

Would you give up 2 points for 3x the speed?

Data: artificialanalysis.ai
0:17
Cuth Verified account @ItsCuthulhu
New result: torchcast-decision-4b (5b) finished my decision-model bench and it beat Jev, the model to beat.

It scored 80 out of 100 across 1,999 real decisions, with no errors. That puts it ahead of Jev (78/100) by 3 points.

Best at judging which answer helps more. Weakest at yes-or-no questions.
It makes about 19 decisions a second, fast enough to judge things live as they happen.
Size: 5b parameters, fits one spark with room to spare.

Full table: bench.jakecuth.com