who is building the anduril of chinese spy sexpot
my
Verified account This account is verified. Learn more@JeremyRubin
4.4K Following 24K Followers 31K Posts
Latest posts 5
Actually I think the opposite; this is great news for Quantum Computing!
Essentially, if you think of quantum computers as being "magic that shouldn't work".
You could draw the conclusion that well likely never build a real one because we don't live in a universe with magic.
Now we have a proof that they can't generalize, it makes it less crazy that we could build a functional quantum computer for the special cases where it does work.
Essentially, if you think of quantum computers as being "magic that shouldn't work".
You could draw the conclusion that well likely never build a real one because we don't live in a universe with magic.
Now we have a proof that they can't generalize, it makes it less crazy that we could build a functional quantum computer for the special cases where it does work.
wow reads like a horror movie for quantum VCs.View quoted post on X
Essentially proves that for majority of problems quantum computers cannot achieve exponential computational advantages, only for those with special patterns, and in those cases the solution needs to be custom found (like factoring numbers etc)
suspect we aren't even close to asking the right questions around what are the right use cases for qc
Aaronson-Ambainis proof, if I'm understanding it right, is great news for symmetric crypto e.g. AES-256!
on the bright side, the elections results give us a strong prior that the singularity hasn't happened yet
chat is it over for me i just walked in on my wife googling how tall marco rubio is (im taller)