Pinned post
This unredacted version shows that they knew that the T7 promoter was the only promoter required for manufacturing using the Process 2 plasmid/E. Coli system. Why was T7 kept redacted? Weird.
They admit that eukaryotic SV40 promoter can be used to express the kan gene but it's NOT required to do so, and shouldn't have been in the plasmid since it's a mammalian promoter! What if it got into mammalian cells? They grabbed the wrong plasmid from the gene therapy shelf in haste to "win" the platform race. BIG OOPSIE.
Anyone trying to cover this up or downplay the potential serious downstream effects WITHOUT A THOROUGH SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION FIRST is CONSPIRING against the people who were subjected to these shots by coercion. No one can make claims of non-functionality or non-effects without PROVING THAT THIS IS THE CASE WITH CASE STUDIES AND PROVABLE CLINICAL OUTCOMES.
It is disturbing to note that it has been demonstrated in a preprint that DNA fragments (spike and ORI) have been found in an intimal sarcoma (tumor tissue) of a multiply-injected 35-year old male upon surgical resection. He died 675 days after diagnosis, from an aggressive cancer that metastasized to his brain.
@Kevin_McKernan @CharlesRixey @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @SenRandPaul @NIHDirector_Jay @scoopsmcgoo @P_McCulloughMD @NathanMeadPhD @DeanAllisonMP @RennickGBR @realDonaldTrump
@RWMaloneMD @brownstoneinst @jeffreytucker @Honest_Medicine @joevaron @joshg99 @Fynnderella1 @RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry
They admit that eukaryotic SV40 promoter can be used to express the kan gene but it's NOT required to do so, and shouldn't have been in the plasmid since it's a mammalian promoter! What if it got into mammalian cells? They grabbed the wrong plasmid from the gene therapy shelf in haste to "win" the platform race. BIG OOPSIE.
Anyone trying to cover this up or downplay the potential serious downstream effects WITHOUT A THOROUGH SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION FIRST is CONSPIRING against the people who were subjected to these shots by coercion. No one can make claims of non-functionality or non-effects without PROVING THAT THIS IS THE CASE WITH CASE STUDIES AND PROVABLE CLINICAL OUTCOMES.
It is disturbing to note that it has been demonstrated in a preprint that DNA fragments (spike and ORI) have been found in an intimal sarcoma (tumor tissue) of a multiply-injected 35-year old male upon surgical resection. He died 675 days after diagnosis, from an aggressive cancer that metastasized to his brain.
@Kevin_McKernan @CharlesRixey @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @SenRandPaul @NIHDirector_Jay @scoopsmcgoo @P_McCulloughMD @NathanMeadPhD @DeanAllisonMP @RennickGBR @realDonaldTrump
@RWMaloneMD @brownstoneinst @jeffreytucker @Honest_Medicine @joevaron @joshg99 @Fynnderella1 @RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry
