Pinned post
I am pleased to see the government response to Task Force on Nuclear Regulation.
First, it has been published on time which sends a positive signal about priorities.
Second, the detailed and considered response shows that the Government is serious about reform.
Third, almost every recommendation is to be taken forward fully.
All of this should help bring about a substantial reduction in cost and delivery schedules for new nuclear. This should spur greater confidence for investors in nuclear in the UK.
A few recommendations will be taken forward in a different way that in our report, as we envisaged. The role of the Implementation structure will be critical in continuing to ensure that this is prioritised.
First, it has been published on time which sends a positive signal about priorities.
Second, the detailed and considered response shows that the Government is serious about reform.
Third, almost every recommendation is to be taken forward fully.
All of this should help bring about a substantial reduction in cost and delivery schedules for new nuclear. This should spur greater confidence for investors in nuclear in the UK.
A few recommendations will be taken forward in a different way that in our report, as we envisaged. The role of the Implementation structure will be critical in continuing to ensure that this is prioritised.
For years our nuclear regulatory system hasn't worked.View quoted post on X
Today that changes with our plan to implement the recommendations of the @JohnFingleton1 review.
47 reforms. One lead regulator. A faster path to new nuclear projects & clean, secure power.
Patrick Vallance explains 🎥