Twitxy Saved

Matt W

@MattWoj

Life + Family + Faith + NGO/UN + I follow @Campaignlife
Canada Joined August 2010
674 Following 438 Followers 3.3K Posts

Latest posts 5

Matt W @MattWoj
187 Canadian MPs voted to expand euthanasia…
Campaign Life Coalition Verified account @CampaignLife Oct 7
BREAKING: Liberals vote down protection for the mentally ill, open door to ‘advance request’ euthanasia for dementia – Press Release

OTTAWA, October 7, 2026 — The Liberal Government today defeated Conservative-sponsored Bill C-218, which would have stopped the expansion of euthanasia (MAiD) to Canadians whose sole underlying condition is mental illness. The vote was 187-141.

Hours before the vote, Liberal Justice Minister Sean Fraser told media that the Liberal government intends to table its own legislation this fall to indefinitely exclude people whose sole condition is a mental illness from euthanasia.

But, in an alarming move for concerned Canadians, the government said its legislation will also expand euthanasia by decriminalizing advance requests, a long-sought goal of the euthanasia lobby. If passed, people diagnosed with a serious illness, such as dementia, who may lose the capacity to consent, will be permitted to request to be killed by euthanasia in the future, and will not have to provide consent before it happens.

“The Liberal government is playing with lives,” said Jeff Gunnarson, National President of Campaign Life Coalition (CLC). “It plans to vote down a bill that would protect the mentally ill while claiming it will introduce its own protections. And on the same day, it says that it plans to make euthanasia more available for those suffering with dementia. The Liberal government is still bent on expanding death—it just changed its target.”

Pro-life advocates have warned that euthanasia by advance request is a defining mark along the slippery slope that leads to euthanasia on-demand.

Matthew Wojciechowski, CLC’s Vice President, said a bill like the one Minister Fraser outlined today would be unsupportable.

"The Liberals, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, failed to do the right thing, again. Now they are planning to expand euthanasia through advance requests. This raises serious questions about who is really driving this euthanasia regime. Canadians deserve a government focused on upholding human dignity at all its stages, not one steered by a death lobby of euthanasia activists.”

Campaign Life Coalition thanks MP Tamara Jansen for introducing and championing Bill C-218 and for her steadfast commitment to protecting vulnerable Canadians.
View quoted post on X
Matt W @MattWoj
Life is winning!

“The judge found that abortion victim photography is not obscenity and does not promote hatred and that PPS was unreasonable to adopt a subjective standard.”
Campaign Life Coalition Verified account @CampaignLife Jun 12
CANADIAN PRO-LIFE VICTORY

Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) is celebrating a significant legal victory after the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled on June 11 that the Parliamentary Protective Service (PPS) violated the Charter-protected freedom of expression rights of CLC and one of its members by prohibiting signs expressing opposition to abortion at a 2023 Parliament Hill event.

“This is an important victory not only for Campaign Life Coalition, but for every Canadian who believes Parliament Hill must remain a place where one can speak freely on the issues that matter most—in this case, the right to life,” said Jeff Gunnarson, National President of Campaign Life Coalition.

“The Court has confirmed that government officials cannot censor political expression simply because they find the message uncomfortable, difficult, or controversial. This is a big win for life and for free-speech rights. This ruling is especially important at a time when freedom of expression and pro-life advocacy are increasingly under pressure in Canada.”

The Court held that the PPS decision infringed section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and was not justified under section 1. The ruling rejected the use of broad and subjective standards to censor political expression on Parliament Hill. The judge found that abortion victim photography is not obscenity and does not promote hatred and that PPS was unreasonable to adopt a subjective standard.

The case arose from a May 2023 press conference organized by CLC ahead of the annual National March for Life. CLC planned to display signs depicting the victims of abortion at various stages of development. Before the press conference began, a PPS officer inspected the signs and prohibited their display, claiming they were too graphic to be shown on Parliament Hill.

“Abortion is not an abstract issue,” said CLC’s Maeve Gainey (then Roche) who was prevented from displaying the images. “It has real victims. The images PPS tried to censor due to a bad policy reveal the truth about what abortion does to preborn children. We do not display these images because they are pleasant. We display them because they are true.”

Gunnarson said that Parliament Hill has long been a place where Canadians gather to communicate political messages directly to lawmakers and to the public. “We are pleased that the Court recognized that constitutional freedoms cannot be restricted through subjective and unpredictable censorship.”

Campaign Life Coalition was represented by constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir. The case was funded by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.

Photos: CLC and staff at the 2023 National March for Life Press Conference on Parliament Hill.
View quoted post on X
Matt W @MattWoj
IVF and Surrogacy horror stories. Not rare.
Live Action Verified account @LiveAction Apr 16
A surrogate mother was FORCED to abort after the baby’s parents discovered their child was missing 2 fingers.

Their child was treated like a product.

His life was destroyed because he didn’t turn out exactly the way his parents wanted.

The surrogate mother was made to undergo a dangerous late-term abortion against her will.

All for the sake of convenience and desire.

This is discrimination.
This is ableism.
This is eugenics.
This is wrong.
View quoted post on X