Twitxy Saved

Milk Road AI

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@MilkRoadAI

Helping millions of investors navigate the AI markets.

Capitalize on the biggest technological change in history across the infrastructure & app layers of AI.
$1 to see analyst portoflios → link.milkroad.com/ai Joined October 2025
429 Following 51K Followers 6.3K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI
The S&P 500 is trading at valuations we haven't seen since some of the biggest stock market bubbles in history.

The S&P 500 is currently trading at roughly 18x forward earnings, while the equal-weighted S&P 500 is trading closer to 16x. For those unfamiliar, the traditional S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, meaning companies like NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet have a much greater influence on the index. The equal weighted S&P 500, on the other hand, gives all 500 companies approximately the same weighting. And that difference is becoming increasingly important. Investors are willing to pay significantly higher valuations for the largest technology companies, particularly those benefiting from AI, cloud computing, and other major growth trends.

But what's interesting is that the gap between the two indices has widened considerably compared to much of the last two decades. This tells us that a significant portion of the market's valuation premium is concentrated among the largest companies rather than being distributed equally across the broader market. I think this is particularly interesting because whenever people talk about the stock market being overvalued, they're usually looking at the traditional S&P 500, which is heavily influenced by a relatively small group of companies.

That doesn't necessarily mean the remaining 490 or so stocks are cheap, but it does suggest that valuations across the market are far from uniform.
And historically, periods of elevated valuations have made markets more sensitive to earnings disappointments, rising interest rates, and changes in investor expectations. Personally, I still believe some of the largest technology companies can deliver strong earnings growth over the next several years, but I also think investors are going to become increasingly selective about which companies actually deserve these premiums. This is exactly why I’m getting more selective and if you want to see which AI and tech names I’m investing in at these valuations, check out my full Milk Road Pro portfolio below.

link.milkroad.com/d8cj6v
Melvin Verified account @MelvinInvests 6d
Wall Street's favorite AI stocks might not be nearly as expensive as investors think.

According to Goldman Sachs, the S&P 500's Information Technology sector is trading at just 17x forward earnings, placing its valuation in the 31st percentile of the past 10 years and the 40th percentile of the past 30 years. In other words, technology stocks are actually trading at relatively inexpensive valuations compared to their own historical averages. What's even more interesting is that the sector is sitting near the 28th percentile relative to the broader S&P 500 over the past decade, suggesting technology is unusually cheap compared to the rest of the market.

Meanwhile, consumer staples, industrials, and healthcare are trading at much higher historical valuation percentiles, even though these sectors generally aren't expected to experience the same earnings growth as some of the largest technology companies. I think this is particularly interesting given the recent selloff across AI and semiconductor stocks. Investors have become increasingly concerned about elevated valuations, the sustainability of AI spending, and whether hyperscalers will generate sufficient returns on their massive investments. But the data suggests that at least some of the valuation premium investors have been worried about may have already disappeared.

Now, this doesn't necessarily mean technology stocks have bottomed or that they're automatically cheap. Earnings estimates could still come down, and individual AI companies may remain expensive. But if earnings continue growing while stock prices remain under pressure, valuations could become increasingly attractive. The bigger question is whether we're witnessing the beginning of a fundamental deterioration in the AI investment cycle or simply a major repricing of some of the market's fastest growing companies. This looks like another buy the dip opportunity to me. If you want to see which AI and tech names I’m investing in at these valuations, check out my full portfolio below.

link.milkroad.com/tx5qip
View quoted post on X
2 replies 1 reposts 11 likes 4.3K views View on X
Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI
$META is trading near $641 today, up about 2.7%, and according to the Wall Street Journal employees have begun testing a prediction market app inside the company.

The app is currently called Takes, and workers can wager on the outcome of questions or events using cred, short for credibility, rather than real money.

That is a key difference from Kalshi and Polymarket, which let people wager real money. The Journal said those platforms have become popular with Gen Z consumers, and both companies are facing lawsuits accusing them of operating illegal gambling platforms.

One of the questions being tested, according to the Journal, is whether Tim Cook will become Nvidia's next CEO.

Employee testing is a step Meta often takes ahead of a public release, though a public launch has not been confirmed.

I think Meta is trying to get closer to a market that is growing fast. But I also think a version with no real money at stake will have a harder time becoming as serious as Kalshi or Polymarket.
Kyle Reidhead | Milk Road Verified account @KyleReidhead 2d
Robinhood's prediction market business went from a rounding error to 12% of the company's revenue in 18 months!

$HOOD customers traded 5.9B event contracts in October, up 136% from a year ago, after doing 0.2B-0.4B a month in mid-2025

Revenue went from $3M in Q1 2025 to $104M in Q1 2026 and $173M in Q3 2026.

Importantly, it's not just sports anymore, with non-sports contracts making up 30% of volume in Q3, double the 15% from the quarter before

Prediction markets are becoming a big business for financial companies!
View quoted post on X
Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI
DDR5 DRAM prices are up nearly 900% in just 15 months, and I think people are seriously underestimating how significant this is for the memory industry.

Back in August 2025, a 16Gb DDR5 DRAM chip was trading at roughly $6.17. Today, that same chip is trading above $60, representing a staggering 877% increase. Even after pulling back slightly from its October peak, prices remain near record highs.

And the reason behind this massive increase comes down to supply and demand. Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have been prioritizing production capacity for HBM and high margin server memory, particularly as hyperscalers continue expanding their AI infrastructure. The problem is that this leaves less capacity available for conventional DRAM, creating additional pressure on an already tight market. What's particularly interesting is what this means for profitability. Memory manufacturing has enormous fixed costs, so when selling prices increase this dramatically, incremental revenue can translate into substantially higher margins and cash flow. That's especially beneficial for companies like $MU, provided higher spot prices eventually translate into realized contract pricing.

But there's another side to this story. Higher memory prices also mean higher costs for server manufacturers, PC makers, and smartphone companies. Eventually, those costs either get passed on to consumers or start eating into margins. And if prices remain elevated for long enough, we could see customers reduce memory configurations or delay purchases.

The biggest question now is how sustainable these prices are. Memory has historically been one of the most cyclical industries in semiconductors, and eventually higher prices encourage more supply. We're already seeing some signs of spot-price momentum cooling.

I'm still bullish on $MU and the broader memory industry over the long term but I think the real opportunity comes down to how long this supply imbalance can persist before additional capacity starts catching up with demand. If you want to see how I’m investing around this cycle and which memory names I think offer the best risk/reward, check out my full Milk Road Pro portfolio below.

link.milkroad.com/d8cj6v
Melvin Verified account @MelvinInvests 4h
According to Korean media, Samsung is pouring 46 trillion won, about $34 billion, into turning its Onyang campus into its main HBM4E production base.

The new packaging line is scheduled to start running by June 2028, after another expansion at its Cheonan campus finishes by the end of next year.

Samsung also showed off a prototype of its 7th generation HBM4E chip at the groundbreaking with South Korea's President.

According to estimates, Samsung's monthly HBM packaging capacity grows from about 210,000 wafers in 3Q26 to 290,000 by late 2027 and 370,000 by late 2028.

But here is the part I find most interesting because even with all that spending, new capacity barely adds DRAM bits before 2028, because HBM4E and HBM5 dies are so much bigger and need more layers.

Memory makers are spending like crazy and supply STILL can't catch up.

That is why I think this memory cycle lasts much longer than people expect.
View quoted post on X
2 replies 0 reposts 5 likes 1.6K views View on X
Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI
The race to replace Jensen Huang at Nvidia is coming into focus this morning.

The New York Times listed Ian Buck, the executive who helped build CUDA and now leads hyperscale AI products, among the leading internal candidates for permanent CEO. Colette Kress remains interim CEO while the board searches inside and outside the company. HSBC just downgraded $NVDA to Hold from Buy and cut its price target to $170 from $365. Analyst Frank Lee said the stock is likely to struggle until a permanent successor is named.

The Financial Times reports, citing people familiar with the matter, that Nvidia's board has approached $ARM chief executive Rene Haas about the job. Haas spent about seven years at Nvidia running its computing products business and has led Arm since 2022 and prediction markets moved Haas into the lead after that report circulated.

$NVDA is down about 3.3% near $161, and $ARM is down about 5.3% near $189, after falling as much as 9.7%.

I think this is now a market event for both companies, not just a board event. Investors want to know who is running Nvidia for real, and they may not give the stock much room until they get an answer.
Melvin Verified account @MelvinInvests 18h
This might be one of the saddest and most shocking downfalls we’ve ever seen in the technology industry.

Bloomberg just published a detailed account of Jensen Huang’s final hours as NVIDIA CEO, and some of these details are genuinely hard to believe. According to people familiar with the situation, Jensen was a completely different person during his final hours at NVIDIA. The same man who spent 33 years building one of the most valuable companies in the world, who was known for his relentless energy and obsession with every little detail, reportedly looked completely defeated. His usual commanding personality was gone. He reportedly started responding to things with “whatever” and “I don’t care.” This is someone who was famous for managing around 60 direct reports and personally reviewing employees five biggest priorities, often responding to emails at all hours of the night. Bloomberg says even those responses had started slowing down as the scandal intensified.

And the way everything unfolded is even crazier. When reports first emerged about Jensen’s relationship with Alice Huang, who has been accused of having connections to Chinese intelligence, NVIDIA’s board was initially reluctant to take action. Jensen had reportedly denied being unfaithful for months, including when questioned internally. But after additional reporting surfaced, NVIDIA’s general counsel confronted him at his home, where he admitted to the affair. The board eventually launched an investigation, and Jensen publicly apologized to his family and employees. But things took another turn Wednesday when reports surfaced about another relationship involving NVIDIA executive Kimberly Powell, who reported directly to him. That appears to have been the final straw.

NVIDIA’s directors held an emergency meeting that stretched late into Wednesday night. According to Bloomberg, Jensen was ultimately given no choice but to resign, ending his 33 year association with the company he co-founded. And perhaps the most heartbreaking part of the entire report is what happened afterward. Jensen has reportedly been calling himself a “piece of sh–” and telling people he no longer cares what happens to him. His biggest concern now is his wife and making sure the women linked to him don’t have their lives destroyed by the scandal. Think about how quickly everything changed. Just two weeks ago, Jensen was arguably the most influential person in the entire AI industry. He was meeting with world leaders, influencing American technology policy, negotiating enormous partnerships, and helping shape the future of computing. Now he’s out of the company he spent more than three decades building.

And the situation isn’t necessarily over. Jensen is expected to testify before Congress about his relationship with Alice Huang and whether any sensitive NVIDIA technology or information could have been compromised. I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again. I genuinely believe Jensen is one of the greatest technology CEOs of our generation. What he accomplished at NVIDIA changed the trajectory of the entire AI industry, and nothing that happened this week erases those contributions. But being an extraordinary CEO doesn’t excuse serious personal misconduct or potential national security concerns. It’s just incredibly disappointing watching someone who built something so extraordinary potentially destroy his own legacy in a matter of weeks. NVIDIA will survive and I still believe the long term AI infrastructure story remains intact. But I don’t think people fully appreciate just how difficult replacing Jensen is going to be.
View quoted post on X
2 replies 2 reposts 9 likes 1.9K views View on X
Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI
SpaceX just put a price on its AI campus plans, and the number is enormous.

The company said it will invest more than $74 billion in two supercomputing sites, more than $24 billion at Starbase in Texas and about $50 billion in Cochise County, Arizona.

Reuters reports the Texas site would generate its own power and support more than 500 permanent jobs after already creating more than 3,000 construction jobs. The Arizona campus would create about 1,000 permanent jobs and 5,500 construction jobs, and SpaceX says it plans to use dry cooling with no industrial groundwater use.

Local approvals are still ahead because Cochise County has a hearing in December, and the Starbase City Commission is due to consider a tax break on December 9.

$SPCX is little changed this morning near $139. I think this shows how far SpaceX has already moved beyond rockets as SpaceX’s AI segment generated more than half of its revenue last quarter.
Milk Road AI Verified account @MilkRoadAI 6d
Google's $78.6 BILLION investment portfolio is almost entirely concentrated in ONE stock.

$GOOGL has approximately $78.6 billion invested across 29 positions, with a staggering 94.87% of that portfolio allocated to $SPCX. That works out to roughly $74.6 billion tied to a single holding, leaving just over 5% spread across its remaining investments.

Some of Google's other disclosed positions include:

- $CME (CME Group): 1.36%
- $RVMD (Revolution Medicines): 0.65%
- $QCOM (Qualcomm): 0.63%
- $PL (Planet Labs): 0.56%
- $ARM (Arm Holdings): 0.44%
- $ASTS (AST SpaceMobile): 0.37%
- $FRSH (Freshworks): 0.22%
- $PBLS (Pabilis): 0.18%
- $TEM (Tempus AI): 0.15%

Want to see what Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, and some of the biggest institutional investors are buying and selling?

Sign up for FREE at Milk Road to track their portfolios, latest investments, and changes in holdings all in one place.

milkroad.com/?utm_medium=so…
View quoted post on X