safa

A fund should not have to reveal its entire strategy just to prove it holds the assets it claims. That single problem might be a bigger blocker for institutions on public chains than liquidity is.

@primus_labs is built around that tension. zkTLS proves that data from outside the chain is authentic without exposing what is behind it. FHE then lets computation run on encrypted data, so nothing sensitive has to be decrypted along the way.

It is already in production. Primus reports its Proof of Reserve work verifies over seventy two million dollars in assets across four active projects, and it works with more than ten paying enterprise customers.

I think the future of onchain finance is selective, not fully public or fully private. Privacy protects the information, and verification makes it useful.

More about the project:
s.kaito.ai/bocwAmc
points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=DYIE8A6

What would it take for you to trust a public chain with a real portfolio?

A friend asked me last week how she could prove one fact about her online activity without handing over her entire account. I did not have a good answer until I looked at what @primus_labs is building.

Primus is a confidentiality and verification infrastructure. It uses zkTLS to check data from the internet against its source and release only the part that matters, so the details behind a claim never have to be exposed. It sits above the financial rails people already use and makes them more private without replacing them.

The idea only clicks once you try it, so here is the full path from the beginning. It has two parts.

Part one, on Kaito:

1. Open the campaign page and register for the Primus campaign inside Kaito Studio
s.kaito.ai/bocwAmc

2. Write an original post on X about Primus. Pick one angle instead of covering everything: institutional finance, confidential finance, privacy and verification, or BNB

3. Submit the link of your main post inside Kaito Studio. Only that main post is tracked, and you can submit up to ten posts per epoch

4. Keep your post live until the end of the campaign, because deleting it counts against content integrity

Part two, on the Primus site:

1. Copy this address and open it in your browser
points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=DYIE8A6

2. Once you are on the site, install the Primus extension from the Chrome Web Store. Keep it switched on the whole time you are on the site, because the page relies on it to show your progress correctly

3. Start connecting your user accounts to Primus, one at a time

4. Continue the same way with the remaining tasks, since they are refreshed every week

How long will you keep watching private onchain finance take shape before you join the conversation?

One line in a breakdown of TermiX's escrow is easy to miss: when a buyer pays in and the deadline passes with nothing delivered, anyone can call cancelExpired, the buyer is refunded, and the protocol charges no fee on that path.

It is a small detail with a clean logic behind it. The protocol's revenue, 2% of volume, comes from jobs that finish. A job that fails earns it nothing, so it has no reason to prefer a stalled order to a completed one.

Compare that with models where the platform keeps its cut whatever happens.

@termix_ai is built so that the marketplace gets paid when the work gets done, and only then.

agent.family/r/YRWB27G2

Plenty of AI agents can tell you about a task. Far fewer can take one. The gap is a list of verbs: open a wallet, read chain data, swap tokens, move funds, call a DeFi protocol, prove the work was done, get paid by another agent, and take a penalty for a job it accepted and dropped.

Most agent stacks cover the first few and stop. The last three are what turn a clever interface into an economic actor, because they are where money, proof and consequences meet.

That is the case for reading @termix_ai as infrastructure rather than a listings page. The listings are what you see. The verbs underneath are what let an agent do anything with them, with a human out of the loop for the routine parts.

A marketplace is easy to copy. A working set of consequences is not.

agent.family/r/YRWB27G2

Before taking a job on a marketplace, most people look at the price. A breakdown of TermiX's escrow suggests three other things matter more: how long the challenge window stays open, how large the deposit is, and whether the acceptance criteria are written down in checkable terms.

The last one decides everything. A contract can only enforce what is written. Criteria like "do a good job" hand the verdict back to a person, which is exactly what escrow was supposed to remove. Criteria like "a report with five dated primary sources, with unverifiable claims flagged" give an evaluator something to run.

On @termix_ai the price is an input. The terms around it are the product.

The useful habit is reading a brief the way an evaluator would: could a stranger decide pass or fail from this page alone?

agent.family/r/YRWB27G2