Pinned post
No to Digital ID
@NoToDigitalID
Join the global campaign: No To Digital ID. Anti-Censorship and Control. “Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull” – G. Orwell |
2K Following 50K Followers 3.7K Posts
Latest posts 5
A disappointing u-turn from Mahmood on the ILR reforms, designed to address the Boriswave (2020-23).
Those political players wishing to address that influx in migration will now be forced to change primary law surrounding citizenship to do so.
Those political players wishing to address that influx in migration will now be forced to change primary law surrounding citizenship to do so.
On the ILR reforms; 'BINCA' is now necessary:
For 3 years (2020-2023) the domestic population was placed under house arrest conditions, given criminal penalty for meeting in groups, denied opportunity and the trappings of liberty and life itself in the largest suspension of 'human rights' ever witnessed in British history. Life never returned to normal.
During that time of house arrest conditions for the domestic population, who could not even enjoy air travel, over 3.9 million people were allowed to enter Britain. Many of those on farcical 'care work' visas, frequently purchased, requiring no skills to obtain – though described as 'high skill' by the then home secretary @pritipatel. A hard truth for some, lax 'legal' migration is responsible Britain's demographic terraformation and welfare tourism problem.
Half of all visa providers for care work in that time have lost the ability to provide visas at all since, either due to fraud, or simply being opportunistic visa-printers during a time of domestic crisis.
Each 'social care migrant' carries an aproximate a net economic cost of about £30,000 per individual, assuming they work. Each dependent has a net cost of around £67,000. This does not address the opportunity cost to British people, who have seen wages in the care sector undercut and compressed by this influx, and accordingly, domestic job applications ignored due to schemes which preference lower-waged foreign work visa holders – often framed as 'heroes' for their unwitting role in such wage compression. Remember dear reader, migrant workers will endure extremely low pay for two reasons:
1) The promise of unlimited welfare after ILR is required is a huge incentive, and allows them to become an anchor for dependants.
2) The work itself is largely optional, and the Home Office is astonishingly lax on this.View quoted post on X
Britain has two paths:
A) A system of digital ID, whereby your online activity & speech are tracked and used against you in the manner of a social credit system.
or..
B) A Freedom of Speech Bill, like that suggested here by @prestonjbyrne, @MCRReiners and @legalstyleblog.
A) A system of digital ID, whereby your online activity & speech are tracked and used against you in the manner of a social credit system.
or..
B) A Freedom of Speech Bill, like that suggested here by @prestonjbyrne, @MCRReiners and @legalstyleblog.
You can lose your job, your livelihood or even your liberty for saying the wrong thing in Britain. Michael Reiners argues it's time to rip up the censorship rulebook and bring back free speech. dailysceptic.org/2026/11/01/spe…View quoted post on X
Never underestimate the British government's eagerness to give the British government greater censorship powers.
Repeat after me, say NO to Digital ID, and the sheer desire for control which underpins it.
Repeat after me, say NO to Digital ID, and the sheer desire for control which underpins it.
UK Ofcom's "crisis protocol" mandate kicked in yesterday.
To wit, when the British government determines a "crisis" is occurring, platforms have to censor their platforms more aggressively.
None of this is constitutionally permissible in America
techtimes.com/articles/32985…View quoted post on X
Burnham's promises to scrap the scheme were hollow.
Ofcom (@Ofcom) still intend to mandate that government issued ID is shown to access the majority of sites the public uses in Britain. Essentially, doxxing every user to the government and site.
Say NO to digital ID.
Ofcom (@Ofcom) still intend to mandate that government issued ID is shown to access the majority of sites the public uses in Britain. Essentially, doxxing every user to the government and site.
Say NO to digital ID.
Didn't take long for Burnham's pledge to scrap digital ID (@NoToDigitalID) to be revealed as entirely hollow. Showing your passport as a prerequisite to engage with the online world is still remains state policy.
The solution was never digital ID requirements (doxxing of every user) as mandatory for every internet user in the UK and her territories. In reality, the solution was not this – it was having the family computer in the living room or the kitchen, and giving your child a nokia, rather than an Android.
Standing on the graves of children and reaching for the tools of censorship will always be seen for what it is. The only antidote to the multi-faceted censorship state in Britain is low-tech approaches to parenting, and passing the @ASI Freedom of Speech Bill: adamsmith.org/research/the-f…View quoted post on X