Pinned post
The ICC is a court of last resort, delivering justice and accountability for victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
The Trump admin’s actions are a direct attack on Ukrainians, Palestinians, the Rohingya, Darfurians, and Afghan women and girls’ right to pursue accountability.
The Trump admin’s actions are a direct attack on Ukrainians, Palestinians, the Rohingya, Darfurians, and Afghan women and girls’ right to pursue accountability.
The Open Society Foundations today condemned the Trump administration’s announcement of new sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) as an institution, an unprecedented escalation of its campaign against the independent court dedicated to ensuring accountability for the gravest crimes.View quoted post on X
“Since its establishment, the International Criminal Court has served as a court of last resort, delivering justice and accountability for victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide when they have nowhere else to turn. The Trump administration’s actions are a direct attack on the victims’ right to pursue accountability for crimes against Ukrainians, Palestinians, the Rohingya, Darfurians, and women and girls in Afghanistan,” said Binaifer Nowrojee @NowrojeeOSF, president of the Open Society Foundations.
“The attack on the ICC punishes the people seeking justice instead of the perpetrators. These actions threaten to create a new era of impunity, where grave crimes go unpunished, and the perpetrators are free to repeat them. No one should be beyond the reach of the law, no matter how powerful. Open Society is committed to a world where human rights are protected, power is constrained by law, and justice is available to all.”
Open Society supported the campaign to establish the ICC following the genocides in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s to prevent those responsible from evading justice. As a court of last resort for victims who have nowhere else to turn, the ICC investigates and prosecutes individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and the crime of aggression when national authorities are unwilling or unable to do so. Nearly two-thirds of UN member states have joined the court. Its work spans the globe; it has initiated 18 investigations in countries including the Philippines, Sudan, Venezuela, and Ukraine.
Open Society has long supported the ICC’s engagement with civil society and has consistently opposed efforts to undermine the court’s independence. In August, the Open Society Institute, a part of the Open Society Foundations, joined three human rights groups in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s previous sanctions targeting individuals and organizations affiliated with or assisting the work of the ICC.
In 2025, the Open Society Justice Initiative joined more than 70 civil society and faith-based organizations in warning against the potential use of sanctions to attack the court. The group argued that the ICC performs a vital role in international affairs by investigating crimes that shock the conscience of humanity and that “it does so in a manner that protects the due process rights of the accused, the sovereignty of states, including the United States, and the rights of victims.”
Open Society is committed to the independent and impartial pursuit of international justice wherever crimes that violate international law have been perpetrated.
