𝐀𝐙𝐔𝐁𝐔𝐈𝐊𝐄

𝐇𝐢, 𝐈’𝐦 𝐀𝐙𝐔𝐁𝐔𝐈𝐊𝐄.

I turn 𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐬 into 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 people 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐮𝐬𝐞, and 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰 with.

From strategy and documentation to user experience, community, and execution — I help bridge the gap between vision and reality.

𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐫:

❏ Onboarded 𝟏𝟓𝟎𝟎+ community members across multiple product launches before launch.

❏ Produced 𝟏𝟎+ educational documents that supported user onboarding and adoption across 𝟕 product launches.

❏ Organized campaigns that engaged 𝟐𝟎𝟎+ participants, contributing to 𝟕 successful marketing campaigns between 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔.

❏ Helped onboard contributors, partners, community leaders, and core team members for growing ecosystems.

Whether you’re building in Web3, AI, or tech, I help make complex things feel simple.

I don’t just turn ideas into products — I turn products into experiences people understand, trust, and advocate for.

𝐌𝐲 𝐃𝐌𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🫱🏾‍🫲🏻

A launchpad can help a token go live. The harder question is: what gives its first supporters a reason to stay involved after launch?

That question took me into @selectfdn’s docs. At Genesis, contributors enter at the same price. If a project reaches its target and migrates, those contributors receive their tokens and a pro rata share of fees from trading in its project/ETH pool. Their connection to the project can continue beyond the initial contribution.

But the piece that made me stop and study the design is the second pool.

At migration, 90% of a project’s liquidity allocation goes to its project/ETH pool. The remaining 10% goes to a project/$SELECT pool. That second pool begins with the project’s tokens positioned above the launch price; it holds no $SELECT at first. If trading moves into that range, the pool draws $SELECT from the open market. Fees from that pool accrue to the protocol.

That is the flywheel as I understand it: give early supporters a lasting stake in a project’s activity, give each new launch a connection to $SELECT, and let actual trading determine how much of that connection becomes active. More launches create more opportunities for the mechanism to work, but a launch alone does not guarantee demand or success.

As someone who works on community building and onboarding, I admire the thought behind the first part most. A fee share cannot build a community by itself. People still need a product they understand, a team they trust, and reasons to participate. @selectfdn has put an incentive alongside that work, where many launch models leave supporters with little reason to remain after the first trade.

I made this video to explain the mechanism visually. Watch it, then read the docs and tell me which part of the flywheel you think matters most: the contributor incentive or the $SELECT pairing.

New to Select? Trace the loop:

Docs: select.foundation/docs#select-to…

Launches: token.select

Team/community: @selectfdn

Follow project from Genesis to live trading, then inspect its ETH and $SELECT pools.

Where did you find this post? 👀

No reposts for now, please. I’m testing how far the algorithm carries it.

For You page → Like
Following page → Say “hi”
Someone reposted it → Reply “FB”
My profile → Drop a 🫱🏾‍🫲🏻

I’m worried I might lose this account, so help me see where this post is reaching 🙏🏿

Good Morning, CT ☕️

Word of the day: Positioning.

A great product can still struggle if people don’t understand where it fits in their lives.

Build value, yes.

But communicate that value until the right people can see themselves using it.

Have a great day, frens. 🥂

Invest in your craft, surround yourself with creatives and have value (capital)……….

You can’t make it with 0$ opportunities no more. Either you bleed or brain max out, you must pay for this kind of success.