Twitxy Saved

Bart de Witte

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@OpenMedFuture

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช lived in ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ now ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Med AI Democratisation 25+ yrs Digital Health leadership, father ex-IBM ex-SAP @isaree_ai blog.hippoai.org eu/acc
Berlin & Antwerp bartdewitte.com Joined November 2007
2.5K Following 7.4K Followers 15K Posts

Latest posts 5

Bart de Witte Verified account @OpenMedFuture
Jensen wasnโ€™t giving away Nvidiaโ€™s edge with open models.

He was protecting it.
Classic move: commoditize the complement. Keep the scarce thing (GPUs + CUDA) expensive and locked in, make everything else free so more people need the chips.

Thatโ€™s why he greenlit approx $26B for open models over five years.

A CFO running the show thinks in quarters. Guidance, margins, attach rates. That mindset is fine for earnings calls.

Itโ€™s terrible for multi-year bets that deliberately make software free so hardware demand explodes later.

Open source isnโ€™t the risk. Short-term financial optics overriding the strategy is.
Bart de Witte Verified account @OpenMedFuture
Between 2021 and 2024, the best available intelligence per gigabyte of model size rose 187-fold. That is a doubling every four to five months. Moore's law doubled every eighteen to twenty-four months. Model compression has been running three to four times faster than Moore's law. Put differently: GPT-3-level capability on the standard knowledge benchmark needed 350 gigabytes in 2021. By 2025, the same capability fit in 0.4 gigabytes. That is not an improvement of twenty percent. It is a reduction of 875 times in under five years.