Twitxy Saved

Paleoncologist

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@PaleoOnc

Got lost on the way to dinosaur school. Now an MD
Sermo: Sp1ndoctor
Would rather learn than “be right”. Questions are in good faith.
Joined October 2022
1.4K Following 1.4K Followers 14K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Paleoncologist Verified account @PaleoOnc
Where it all began for Paleoncologist

This is my first dinosaur book, copyright 1974. I think I was 6 when I got it new.

It was called a "step up book." My parents subscribed to a Dr Suess book club (family lore says I taught myself to read with all the Dr Suess classics) and then I advanced to picking out my own books. I am pretty sure I chose it myself.

I've probably read it over 100 times (It is not long).
Still for sale on Amazon, but I hope it has been updated.

It is part of a series of "XXX did the strangest things" by Leonora and Arthur Hornblow, but the prehistoric monsters was my favorite.

It remains on a prominent site on my bookshelf because it simultaneously marks where my love for dinosaurs, reading, learning, and science took off, and has really never slowed down. Although my interests have often changed over the years

I went on to read essentially every dinosaur book in the young adult section of the Brooklyn public library. I tried to read the adult books, but they were a bit boring.

Not long after I finished all the dinosaur books I wanted to read, I discovered Tolkien, CS Lewis, Frank Baum (All the Oz books, not just the Wizard) and the whole sci-fi / fantasy genre, which I began to enjoy a bit more than boring adult paleontology books.

Next pictured, the cover and first page of the dinosaur book I "wrote" myself at the ripe old age of 7 or 8, when I fancied myself a young paleontologist. I shamelessly plagiarized from the attached book, all typed on my Mom's manual typewriter, which should be painfully obvious.

It is all of ten pages, including the Table of Contents.
It has never been published, and has only been read by my immediate family (until now) and they've probably forgotten about it.

If anyone would like to publish it, let me know.
I will need an editor
10 replies 1 reposts 16 likes 2.9K views View on X
Paleoncologist Verified account @PaleoOnc
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eco…

I’ll post this great pod again and the author’s recent post here for anyone pondering the implications of the fertility collapse
podcasts.apple.com The Great Fertility Collapse (with Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde) Podcast Episode · EconTalk · October 12 · 1h 11m
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde Verified account @JesusFerna7026 2d
Today, Foreign Affairs publishes a long essay I wrote summarizing some of my work on the global fertility collapse:

foreignaffairs.com/united-states/…

It was a fantastic experience (with great editorial support) because the essay pushed me beyond pure economics to discuss issues such as geopolitics and polarization. Unlike some commentators, I don’t think the first-round economic consequences of fertility decline matter most; the second-round political and social ones do.

Yes, social security systems worldwide are in danger, but reality will impose itself sooner or later. The same politicians who swear over their ancestors’ tombs that retirement benefits will remain untouched will cut them (even if they are French). It will not be pretty, and most likely the cuts will come only after a major crisis and after politicians have tried everything else and failed.

Similarly, businesses will adapt to shrinking markets and valuations. Those who claim that capitalism somehow needs constantly expanding markets will be proven wrong. After all, this is the same misguided understanding of markets that has been proven wrong again and again since September 14, 1867, and that nobody really believes unless they have had the misfortune of earning a Ph.D. in a humanities department at an Ivy League school.

The real consequences will come when collapsing populations poison political systems. Look at the recent elections in eastern Germany. That is the future for all of us.

Also, the relative standing of great powers will shift drastically. Given current demographic trends, the U.S. will have a larger population than China by around 2100. The exact date depends on assumptions about net immigration into the U.S., but even with zero net immigration, the U.S. will overtake China by 2128. And Russia’s demographic future is only slightly more optimistic than China’s.

Those who dismiss these changes forget how antiquity ended in Western Europe. The western part of the Roman Empire entered acute demographic decline around 200 CE. By 476 CE, the western empire no longer existed. Despite some revisionist views that have cast a more positive light on late antiquity (and rightly corrected what was sometimes an overly negative assessment of the period), the fact is that England or France in 600 CE had lost most of their classical heritage, and material life had lost at least an order of magnitude in sophistication. The eastern part of the empire, however, weathered its demographic collapse much better and lasted another millennium.

No, I don’t believe we will go extinct (the Amish and Haredi will be enough for the survival of humankind), but the world will be very different in 2200 regardless of how you feel about it. The rational is the real and the real is the rational.
View quoted post on X
Paleoncologist Verified account @PaleoOnc
“Natural sorrow wrests away my power of self-control and I am overwhelmed by sorrow. I am tormented by two emotions : grief and fear-and I do not stand firm against either.”

Wow
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬 Verified account @lymanstoneky 3d
The single longest Roman inscription EVER discovered is a 2000+ word INCREDIBLE wifeguy inscription honoring his (objectively incredible) wife. It includes detailed descriptions of her being revenged on her parent's killers and getting into street brawls.
droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/Laudat…
View quoted post on X