I understand why this makes sense from the outside, but it's not viable.
SWEETPOKER isn't an info product with fixed costs. We spend thousands per month on each player we accept. (Six figures per year on each nosebleed player)
We can't afford to take NL5 players.
SWEETPOKER isn't an info product with fixed costs. We spend thousands per month on each player we accept. (Six figures per year on each nosebleed player)
We can't afford to take NL5 players.
@PhilGalfond @SweetPokerCFP So you take winners and make them winners? What a concept. How about taking the 10 biggest losers in NL5 and making them crush NL100K. Then we will believe your coaching has meritView quoted post on X