Pinned post
Thrilled to finally drop the project I’ve been working on for the last few months - my four-part mini-series (and a lot more) on the people and places that embody structural economic ruptures driving the “affordability” crisis
Pinned post
Sonny Styles will return to Ohio Stadium this weekend to ring the Victory Bell before Ohio State’s game against Northwestern. elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-foo…View quoted post on X
CNN announced today that CNN Breaks It Down with @Phil_Mattingly is expanding to a twice-weekly live show and video podcast, breaking down what the biggest questions in business, economics and politics mean for your life and wallet.View quoted post on X
Streaming live Tuesdays and Thursdays at 10aET or wherever you get your podcasts.
Details: bit.ly/4AmVnoc
When I’m wrong, I’m wrong. I thought when unemployment was low, GDP was hi, household income rose, it meant everyone was winning.View quoted post on X
Not true.
The American economy has decoupled the economic progress of asset owners from wage earners to such a degree that broad based measures of success are no longer reliable measures of progress.
This single issue of asset ownership vs progress of wage earners will be the defining issue in all future elections.
Other issues will get caught in the interpretation (price of eggs, Iran war, price of gas etc) but the candidate that realizes that those are downstream of asset vs wage earners and gets their messaging focused on it will win.
No amount of money spent in an election or gerrymandering will change this outcome.
That is what I learned on Nov3.