Twitxy Saved

Phil Mattingly

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@Phil_Mattingly

@CNN • Buckeye • 434•845•913•30•813•910•419•614•617•202•212•202 • philip.mattingly@cnn.com/ philip.mattingly@protonmail.com
Washington, DC cnn.com/videos/title-2… Joined January 2010
2K Following 144K Followers 67K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Phil Mattingly Verified account @Phil_Mattingly
Thrilled to finally drop the project I’ve been working on for the last few months - my four-part mini-series (and a lot more) on the people and places that embody structural economic ruptures driving the “affordability” crisis
11 replies 28 reposts 76 likes 67K views View on X
Phil Mattingly Verified account @Phil_Mattingly
We’re expanding!
Come hang out every Tues/Thurs - and, as always, in-box is open for all brilliant (or even halfway decent) ideas to target for future eps
CNN Communications Verified account @CNNPR 5h
CNN announced today that CNN Breaks It Down with @Phil_Mattingly is expanding to a twice-weekly live show and video podcast, breaking down what the biggest questions in business, economics and politics mean for your life and wallet.
Streaming live Tuesdays and Thursdays at 10aET or wherever you get your podcasts.
Details: bit.ly/4AmVnoc
View quoted post on X
7 replies 8 reposts 93 likes 12K views View on X
Phil Mattingly Verified account @Phil_Mattingly
someone should've spent last year building a video doc series IDing & exploring the structural ruptures in the U.S. economy's foundations through the people actually experiencing them to explain the paradox fueling the dramatic divergence between macro indicators & sentiment
Chamath Palihapitiya Verified account @chamath 2d
When I’m wrong, I’m wrong. I thought when unemployment was low, GDP was hi, household income rose, it meant everyone was winning.

Not true.

The American economy has decoupled the economic progress of asset owners from wage earners to such a degree that broad based measures of success are no longer reliable measures of progress.

This single issue of asset ownership vs progress of wage earners will be the defining issue in all future elections.

Other issues will get caught in the interpretation (price of eggs, Iran war, price of gas etc) but the candidate that realizes that those are downstream of asset vs wage earners and gets their messaging focused on it will win.

No amount of money spent in an election or gerrymandering will change this outcome.

That is what I learned on Nov3.
View quoted post on X
1 replies 1 reposts 4 likes 4.3K views View on X