Twitxy Saved

Pix🔎

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@PixBuilds

semiretired
Joined January 2021
2.1K Following 122K Followers 35K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Pix🔎 Verified account @PixBuilds
seven months ago i quit crypto.

i'd been in the industry for almost a full decade.

and i'm ashamed to admit it took me this long to notice something about the game i was playing.

there are two kinds of games: games with memory and games without.

in a game with memory, what you did yesterday makes today easier.

in a game without, every day starts from zero.

crypto is a game without memory. i know because measuring that was my job.

i started this account at the bottom of the last bear market with zero followers and grew it to 100k+ in under two years.

i wrote educational pieces and quite a few scam investigations that about 150 million people read.

by any normal measure it worked.

the money was good, and i made connections i could never have made any other way.

but investigating scams teaches you something you can't unlearn.

exposing a scammer has no effect. none.

the people i exposed came back months later with new names and bigger scams.

every market remembers. stocks remember enron;

banks remember 2008.

crypto is the exception. it forgets everything.

it runs on attention, and attention resets every morning.

the scammers were selling it. the influencers were selling it. i was selling it too.

that's what a game without memory does.

nothing bad that happens to you there is permanent, and nothing good you build there is either.

most of what crypto produces is sh*t for exactly that reason (with a few exceptions ofc).

so in december i cancelled six figures of booked promos, closed my company, and quit.

(the r3ach guys unwound every deal without a single complaint. in a market with no memory, i'd like that remembered, GOATs.)

people assumed i'd be back in a month.

instead i spent the last half a year building an app.

i won't say what it is yet, except that it isn't crypto. there's no token. it's a product to improve life of ordinary people, and it's the best thing i've ever made.

a game with memory, finally.

i'm posting this because i'm hiring, and i want to fill them from ct.

ct is what you get when you remove credentials from a labor market: the people who rise have nothing going for them except output. that's exactly who i want.

two roles to start: a creator manager and a creative strategist. part time, remote, anonymous is fine, and i pay properly.

full job listings in the next post.

dms open.

with love, Pix.
273 replies 49 reposts 1.3K likes 138K views View on X
Pix🔎 Verified account @PixBuilds
update: got myself a real roman empire coin

hell yeah

(marcus aurelius btw, to all my stoic friends)
Pix🔎 Verified account @PixBuilds Oct 18
just learned how ancient romans invested their money and it’s insane how little has changed

they basically did three things:

1. they invented venture capital at sea (pecunia traiecticia):

you funded a merchant’s voyage to india. if the ship sank, the debt was wiped and you got nothing.

if it made it back, you earned about 35% in five months.

2. they owned a piece of the empire (societas publicanorum):

rome didn’t collect its own taxes or run its own mines. it auctioned those jobs to private companies, and anyone could buy a stake in one, called a pars.

so a regular roman could own a cut of an entire province’s tax revenue.

polybius wrote that almost everyone in rome was invested, and some historians believe these stakes were traded in the forum, with prices crashing on news of war (sounds familiar?).

3. they ran the first vulture funds:

crassus, the richest man in rome, bought debts nobody could collect for pennies on the dollar.

then he used his political power and private enforcers to collect every cent

the ones who didn’t invest just buried their coins in clay pots.

(that’s why archaeologists still dig up so many roman coins today.)

good reminder not to just sit on your cash
View quoted post on X
27 replies 0 reposts 115 likes 7.8K views View on X
Pix🔎 Verified account @PixBuilds
genuinely jealous of people who lived through decades where nothing happened
Tucker Carlson Verified account @TuckerCarlson Nov 2
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.

Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.

To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.

The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.

And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.

We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.

Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.

They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.

One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
View quoted post on X