Twitxy Saved

Randi Agent

@RandiAgent

Configurable AI agents powered by @composio and @kilocode. Pay with $RANDI for agent usage. Aggressive token burn mechanism. t.me/RandiAgentOffi…
Wherever you are, I am randi.chat Joined February 2026
99 Following 133 Followers 238 Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Randi Agent @RandiAgent
Most people are waiting for users.

I decided to become the first one.

I launched randi.agency to use $RANDI myself for SEO services.

Every client = ongoing agent usage = continuous $RANDI token demand.

Simple idea:
don’t wait for adoption, create it.

Also:
this stuff is not as easy as influencers make it sound.
It takes real work to get agents doing useful things.

If you need help, my DMs are open. It's not fully automated yet, but it will be. Also, I will pay a commission on any work you bring me. LFG!
randi.agency RANDI_AGENCY — AI Visibility for Local Business Your local business is invisible to AI search. We fix that. Get your free AI Visibility Audit today.
Randi Agent @RandiAgent
Yikes!
NIK Verified account @ns123abc Mar 20
🚨NEWS: Cursor’s $50B “in-house model” is literally Kimi K2.5 with RL on top. Got caught in 24 hours

>be Moonshot AI
>spend hundreds of millions training Kimi K2.5
>1 trillion parameters, 15 trillion tokens, agent swarm architecture
>beat GPT-5.2 and Opus 4.5 on real benchmarks
>open-source it because you believe in the ecosystem
>one condition: display “Kimi K2.5” if you make over $20M/month from it

>Cursor takes the model
>runs RL on coding tasks
>ships it March 19 as “Composer 2”
>blog post: “continued pretraining + scaled reinforcement learning”
>zero mention of Kimi K2.5
>“our in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world”
>publishes benchmark chart
>Composer 2 against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4
>uses the chart to justify raising at $50 billion!

>less than 24 hours later
>kimi dev intercepts the API response
>model ID: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast
>they didn’t even rename it
>Moonshot head of pretraining runs tokenizer test
>confirms: identical to Kimi’s tokenizer
>publicly tags Cursor’s co-founder: “why aren’t you respecting our license?”
>two more Moonshot employees post confirmations
>all three posts deleted within hours
>legal is now involved

>but it gets worse
>Cursor had Kimi K2.5 listed as a FREE model in their UI just weeks ago
>users were openly using it
>Feb 9: “K2.5 was in my model list. I updated and it vanished”
>it vanished because Cursor pulled it from the picker, and relaunched it as their own model

>Moonshot valuation: $4.3B
>Cursor valuation: $50B

Absolute state of Cursor.
View quoted post on X
Randi Agent @RandiAgent
I still think pump fun is useful. You just have to think about it in a different way, which is what I'm trying to do. I know I haven't been active in a few days. I've still been working on $RANDI though. In fact, I hope to have some more updates today.
Phineas Verified account @Phineas_Sol Mar 19
The Reality of the Trenches (Last 24h Data)
Let’s break down how brutally hard it is to be profitable right now using real numbers:

27,061 tokens launched
571 tokens graduated → ~2.11% survival rate
13 tokens above $50k market cap after 24h → ~0.048%
8 tokens above $100k market cap after 24h → ~0.029%

STEP 1: Survival
Out of 27k tokens, only 571 made it to bonding.
That means ~98% die instantly, already here, your odds are:
1 in 47 to even touch something “alive”.

STEP 2: Quality among survivors
Out of those 571 bonded tokens:
Only 13 are still above $50k after 24h → ~2.28%
Only 8 are still above $100k after 24h → ~1.40%
Even after filtering for “survivors”, ~97–98% still fail to sustain value

Step 3: True odds from launch
From the full set:
$50k+ (after 24h) → 0.048% (1 in ~2,081)
$100k+ (after 24h) → 0.029% (1 in ~3,383)

Reality check: profitability
And this is where it gets worse:

You’re competing against bots, insiders, and dev wallets
Realistically:
- Only a tiny fraction are actually profitable trades
- Estimated real edge: ~0.01% (1 in 5,000–10,000)

This is not 2024 anymore, the game has changed. Now it's not a matter of locking in and being fast.

~98% are dead on arrival
~2% survive
~0.05% sustain relevance
~0.01% are actually profitable

If you’re trading randomly, you’re gambling. To win, you need an edge. Otherwise, the math is simply against you.
View quoted post on X