Twitxy Saved

Rich Lowry

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@RichLowry

Author of “The Case for Nationalism”: amzn.to/2YVffBv Editor of National Review. Speaking opps: lowry.speaking@gmail.com
amzn.to/2YVffBv Joined May 2009
1.5K Following 209K Followers 34K Posts

Latest posts 5

Rich Lowry Verified account @RichLowry
This really gets to the crux of the matter re Trump, Vance and Iran, which isn’t whether the war badly hurt Republicans in the midterms or not (obviously it did).

It’s whether or not Trump botched one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency. Vance clearly thinks he did, while Trump—absent a stark turnabout—is never going to concede that he did.

Maybe Vance finds a way to cleverly finesse this question, or Trump gives him a pass on it, or other considerations prevail, but it is very treacherous territory for a VP to have such a dim view of a such a major decision made by the president whose favor he needs to win his party’s nomination.

The question some journalist is going to ask Vance now is, “Do you agree with the president that the war was right call, and that, if he had it to do over again, he should do it again?”

Trump’s statement suggested the answer he wants to hear.
0:36
99 replies 57 reposts 459 likes 172K views View on X
Rich Lowry Verified account @RichLowry
J.D. Vance warned that Republicans would begin floating amnesty after the election, but he didn’t mention that the president would be one of them
AF Post Verified account @AFpost 1d
Trump endorses an amnesty deal with Democrats, saying immigration maximalists are on the “pretty far right” and suggesting that illegals who have been in the US for 10-15 years should have an opportunity to stay.

Follow: @AFpost
View quoted post on X
42 replies 31 reposts 294 likes 20K views View on X
Rich Lowry Verified account @RichLowry
That Ross asks this question in a way that almost no other journalist would makes it so much more interesting and telling than the usual “can’t we all get along?” pablum
Eric Daugherty Verified account @EricLDaugh 1d
🚨 Q: You're entering the next life [before God], all you have to do to enter paradise is feel love and forgiveness for James Comey, Nancy Pelosi, etc...can you do it?

TRUMP: Then I wouldn't be real, would I? The easy answer is, yes, I could forgive. They are extremely dishonest people, bad people, I love our country far more...the answer is no. I want to be honest.

Q: In judgement before God?

TRUMP: I do hate some of my enemies. Look what they put me through.

REPORTER: You had the most charmed and remarkable life of any American in my entire lifetime, and you can't find it in your heart to forgive some of your enemies?

TRUMP: All I have to do is say yes, I can. Can I be honest? I probably cannot do that. Because I do hate some of my enemies — and I always will.

Never heard Trump get asked such a deep question like that before.

He COULD just say "yes" and get out of the question, but he didn't

One thing you have to admit is this man is brutally honest.
View quoted post on X
44 replies 32 reposts 583 likes 46K views View on X
Rich Lowry Verified account @RichLowry
Yep
AG Verified account @AGHamilton29 2d
Not really sure why this argument is still happening, but there isn’t one reason for last week. There are multiple.

Even just on affordability, you can see the clear chart below. Both tariffs and the Iran war played a role because both policies were interactively sold to the public and thus instead served as clear signals that the Trump admin simply didn’t care about the affordability concerns of Americans. The constant talk of the ballroom renovations and obvious corruption further reinforced that message.
View quoted post on X
5 replies 1 reposts 63 likes 17K views View on X