Rogue UAPTF

Not UAP-related, but worth noting that Trump hates @TuckerCarlson, so a nuclear strike on Iran - however unlikely or likely it may have been before - is now almost certain not to happen. I think Tucker knew what he was doing.

Agree fully with @DrPhil here. Skepticism is always warranted until you’ve laid eyes on the technology and @POTUS makes a formal announcement. This is our mission right now. In the interim, anyone who has done any research on this topic can say unequivocally that there are technologies far, far beyond what most humans can even conceive of, and they traverse our planet unencumbered by the physics we know.

Stratton confirms in “Out of the Shadows” that Sean Kirkpatrick, former director at @DoW_AARO, was compromised by the Legacy Program, was instructed to actively lie in interviews, and that classified intelligence reports proving these facts were presented to Congress.

Dr. Loeb, respectfully, I have a few challenges with how you’re posing this question. 1) @jaystratton is a friend of mine, and he often doesn’t respond to me either. He’s not ducking me. He’s just busy. 2) You’ve authored several books yourself. You know how hectic things can be during publishing and release. Your publisher wants you to get on every news network and sell, baby, sell. Jay doesn’t like doing this, and I suspect we’ll see far less of him on TV than we did you during the release of your last couple of books. Nevertheless, the demand for an author’s attention and time is incessant. This is Jay’s first go at this, and he deserves a little grace and patience. 3) the @UAPSAC is a political formality. While its stated goals are admirable, it lacks the teeth necessary to declassify any meaningful information about UAP. Jay is a mission-oriented operator. It may sound harsh (apologies - not my intention) but speaking with the Advisory Council at an unclassified level doesn’t move the ball. Anything Jay says has to be approved by both PCRB and DOPSR - a monumental, time-consuming undertaking. Anything he’d say to you would solely be a regurgitation of what’s been cleared for his book. 4) A member of your council recently took to X to lambaste Jay for not just “disclosing where exactly” recovered UAP technologies are kept. Such a statement betrays either blatant ignorance about national security and protecting our equities from foreign spies, or a troubling agenda. Jay has briefed the necessary people about the what’s and where’s in an appropriately secure environment. He is not going to do a monkey dance on X to appease him. I suspect this individual’s association with the Advisory Council doesn’t exactly get Jay skipping with joy into your next meeting. 5) Have you read Jay’s book yet? It JUST came out. Today. Odd timing to take to X and opine about Jay not taking a meeting with you. I’m reading it today. So far, there’s been a lot of valuable information, and you and the Advisory Council might find some of it useful in your efforts.

@DepDNILukas @JoelValdezDOW how are former contractors / employees supposed to contact PURSUE - call the White House switchboard? What about current? You do understand people are afraid of being killed like others before them, right? They’re not about to go through their FSO.