Twitxy Saved

Save East Po

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@SaveEastPo

DMV residents are clear on this issue: do not overhaul East Potomac Golf links and do not expand to take over the entire peninsula #saveeastpo
Washington, DC saveeastpo.com Joined May 2026
22 Following 2.2K Followers 559 Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Save East Po Verified account @SaveEastPo
The supposed plan for East Potomac Park is an absolute tragedy for so many that call our nation’s capital home.

For 130 years, East Potomac has served every kind of American. Golfers, cyclists, runners, birdwatchers, walkers, picnickers, anyone who just wants to see the cherry blossoms. This plan is a betrayal of the public, of the National Park Service, and of the very act that established this land to be “forever held and used as a park for the recreation and pleasure of the people.”

Ask yourself who a public muni golf course is actually meant to serve. East Potomac was built in direct response to the elitism of golf, a course anyone could walk onto and play, at a time when golf in America belonged almost entirely to the wealthy. Now the government wants to turn it back into exactly that. The very thing this course was built to stand against.

This golf escapade is compounded by the fact that golf is about to become the only purpose of this entire peninsula. Over 130 years, East Potomac expanded, not narrowed, who and what it served. The road came. The playground came. The mini golf course came. The cherry blossoms were planted and became part of the city’s identity. All of it added, piece by piece, to widen who this park belonged to. Now it’s all being wiped out in one fell swoop, for a single use, by a single man.

Donald Trump already owns 16 golf courses. He doesn’t need a 17th. Especially not one carved out of 130 years of public land to chase his own personal trophy.

The heart of this issue really is not about golf. It is about who owns our public lands in America. The National Park Service’s mandate is "...to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations." Not for the enjoyment of one man’s ego. For future generations.

Public land doesn’t become private property just because the person in office wants it to be. That’s the whole point of calling it public.
23 replies 262 reposts 769 likes 18K views View on X
Save East Po Verified account @SaveEastPo
The ultimate irony of this dirty bill is that the only thing that has constrained the Trump Admin from their worst impulses have been the courts, with Congress doing *literally* nothing over the past two years whatsoever to stop them.

And then Congress turns around and is like, you know what, now is actually a great time to weaken / remove those very things that protected against the worst excesses of the past 2 years.

It’s almost as if those conservation statutes exist for a reason?

Brilliant strategy by Senate Democrats.
3 replies 6 reposts 22 likes 834 views View on X
Save East Po Verified account @SaveEastPo
Each day we get a new story along the lines of “Interior Secretary Heavily Invested in Data Centers on NPS Land” or “Senior Trump Officials are Eager to Build Power Plants on Historic Tribal Site” and @SenWhitehouse and @SenatorHeinrich are like yep, now is the PERFECT time to loosen restrictions on what can be done on public lands.

Then they point to a dozen wind projects that the DoW has *stopped* blocking as proof of good faith.

Come on guys.
3 replies 24 reposts 79 likes 1.5K views View on X
Save East Po Verified account @SaveEastPo
@SenatorHeinrich and @SenWhitehouse will be remembered for selling out our public lands.

Their big dirty bill wipes out decades of conservation progress in one piece of legislation.

Clean Water Act, Endangered Species, National Historic Preservation and all the other landmark conservation statutes gone. There’s a reason why all forms of development (e.g., fossil fuel, green energy, transmission, data centers) support this - hint: this will make it easier to build on public land - while every single environmental, historic preservation, and tribal group is mortally opposed to it.

It’s because we SELL OUT the latter for the former.

Not only the very real consequences of this hill but to do it under THIS ADMIN is downright deplorable. These two are being taken for a ride by Mike Lee.

Oh ya, and it’s all been negotiated in private and now trying to ram it through the lame duck as fast as possible.

This bill is simply game over for conservation.
0 replies 14 reposts 43 likes 951 views View on X