🌠 StatsBin.com 📈

🚨 WEBSITE OWNERS: EARN & BURN $LUNC FROM YOUR TRAFFIC 🚨

The StatsBin LUNC Burn Ads Publisher Network is OPEN. 🔥

If you own a website, you can turn your existing traffic into LUNC revenue while helping burn the LUNC supply.

💰 Publishers receive 60% of ad revenue
🔥 20% is used to BURN LUNC
⚙️ 20% supports the Burn Ads network

Getting started is simple:

🌐 Verify your website
📐 Choose your ad format
💻 Add a small script - or use our WordPress app for easy integration
👀 Generate valid ad views
💰 Get paid in LUNC

Your publisher dashboard tracks views, clicks, CTR, earnings and on-chain payments.

And you DON'T need to run a crypto website.

🌍 Any suitable website can apply to become a publisher.

The more websites that join, the bigger the advertising network becomes - creating the potential for more publisher revenue AND more LUNC burned. 🔥

Already running WordPress? We've made getting started even easier with our WordPress app. 🚀

✅️ Sign up your website here👉 statsbin.com/lunc-burn-ads/…

Got traffic? Turn it into LUNC. 🔥

Main Burn Ad page: statsbin.com/lunc-burn-ads

#LUNC #TerraClassic #WordPress #Webmasters #Crypto #Advertising #StatsBin

🔥 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗨𝗣. 𝗡𝗢 𝗣𝗢𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦. 𝗡𝗢 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗦.

You'll notice my #LUNC validator upgrades almost immediately. I lose money every month keeping my infrastructure online, but I made a promise to my delegates and I intend to honour it.

Now look at the absolute circus unfolding on #LUNA.

Foundation-backed validators, concentrated voting power, attempts to remove a board member and questions about who's financially benefiting.

Terraform Labs even documented a programme offering 100,000 LUNA to help new validators get started!

And now Proposal 4853 raises a much bigger question:

𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗜𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗟?

@0xPhilipp @MB_Aejir @phoenix_dir

If foundation delegations are supporting validators connected to decision-makers, where are the independent checks?

Who controls the stake? Who receives the commissions? Who benefits when someone is removed?

𝗗𝗘𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗦𝗡'𝗧 𝗔 𝗦𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗛𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗗 𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗩𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗦.

I run infrastructure for my delegates, not to secure myself a seat at the foundation feeding trough.

And if you're receiving foundation-backed stake while influencing decisions about who gets to remain in power, you should welcome a complete independent audit.

𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗦. 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗔𝗬𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦. 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗦.

That's accountability. Anything less is politics dressed up as governance.

#TerraClassic #LUNC #LUNA #CryptoGovernance

🚨 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗔𝗧 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞! 🚨

Terra Classic is trying to move forward with a crucial software upgrade, Core v4.1.1, under Proposal #12233.

And what does the validator calling itself "BINANCE 🔶 CZ" do?

❌ Votes 𝗡𝗢 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗩𝗘𝗧𝗢!

❌ Uses the governance transaction memo to accuse Juris of being a scam!

❌ Provides no technical justification for opposing the upgrade in that memo!

𝗔𝗕𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗬 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘𝗙𝗨𝗟!

A validator's responsibility is to help secure the blockchain, assess upgrades on their technical merits and act responsibly with the voting power entrusted to them by delegators.

𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗠𝗘𝗔𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗚𝗡!

If there is a genuine technical or security concern with Core v4.1.1, publish the evidence. Explain the risk. Give the community something substantive to evaluate.

Otherwise, why use a software upgrade vote to attack an unrelated project?

𝗠𝗬 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗥:

Validators who repeatedly abuse their position, undermine legitimate development and refuse to provide meaningful technical explanations for critical votes should not expect delegators to keep them in the active validator set.

Delegators have the power to redelegate. Use that power to demand accountability.

And let's be clear: calling yourself "BINANCE CZ" does not establish any official connection to Binance or CZ.

🔎 Proposal: statsbin.com/governance/122…

𝗧𝗛𝗘 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦.

@cz_binance @binance
#TerraClassic #LUNCCommunity #CryptoGovernance #Validators

🚨 𝗛𝗘𝗫𝗫𝗔𝗚𝗢𝗡 - 𝗔 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗟 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗦

@hexxagon_io , as the infrastructure provider managing GreenpeaceUNITED on #LUNC, I believe you need to review the conduct of this validator against your own published Terms of Service.

𝗟𝗘𝗧'𝗦 𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦.

📜 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟮(𝗔) - 𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧

Your terms prohibit using your services for illegal or fraudulent activities.

📜 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟮(𝗕) - 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦

Your terms explicitly prohibit:

❌ Collecting data from other users without permission.
❌ Engaging in unlawful, harassing or defamatory activity.

📜 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟴 - 𝗦𝗨𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡

Hexxagon reserves the right to suspend or terminate services, including for violations of its terms.

📜 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟵 - 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗘𝗦

Hexxagon reserves the right to intervene in disputes at its discretion.

𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘.

Screenshots show members being required to:

🔴 Provide wallet addresses and staking confirmations for registration in a private tracking database.

🔴 Prove delegations to GreenpeaceUNITED and Luna Strike Force BNB.

🔴 Comply within 24 hours or be banned from the private group.

🔴 Meet staking and charitable donation conditions for access to certain discussions.

𝗠𝗬 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗢 𝗛𝗘𝗫𝗫𝗔𝗚𝗢𝗡:

Does this conduct comply with your customer agreement, particularly Section 2(B)?

Are validator operators permitted to maintain databases linking community members to their wallets and use access restrictions to enforce participation?

And if you determine that a customer has breached your terms, will you exercise your powers under Section 8?

I am not claiming these screenshots alone prove an illegal act or contractual breach. I am asking you to investigate and provide a clear answer.

𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗 𝗕𝗘 𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗗 𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗗𝗦.

Infrastructure providers have standards too. The community deserves to know whether they are being enforced.

🔗 hexxagon.io/terms-of-servi…

#LUNC #TerraClassic #Validators #CryptoGovernance #Hexxagon #BINANCE #USTC

🚨 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗗 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗! 🚨

Proposal #12232 - Hyperlane Delivery Report & Payment.

Let's get something straight.

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗗𝗢𝗡𝗘. 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗣𝗔𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦! 💰

The Hyperlane integration was approved under Proposal #12200, and the team has now submitted its delivery report and payment proposal.

✅ LUNC/USTC bridging to Ethereum, BSC and Solana.
✅ Hyperlane integration delivered.
✅ Governance-owned contracts.
✅ Infrastructure that expands Terra Classic's interoperability.

𝗦𝗢 𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗 𝗣𝗔𝗬𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗔 𝗕𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗟𝗘?

If the agreed deliverables have been met, denying payment without legitimate, evidence-based reasons is an 𝗔𝗕𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘.

Governance exists to protect the chain, NOT to punish developers who deliver what the community approved.

And here's the bigger problem.

𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗪𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗 𝗔𝗡𝗬 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗔𝗡𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗 𝗢𝗡 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗜𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡'𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗔𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗠?

Developers have bills, infrastructure costs and families to support. They cannot survive on promises and community applause.

Keep refusing legitimate payments after successful delivery and eventually developers will simply WALK AWAY.

Then the same people voting against development will complain that nothing is being built!

𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗬 𝗔 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗬𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗠.

Validators and delegators should assess the actual deliverables, not personalities, grudges or Telegram narratives.

𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗘𝗦 𝗙𝗔𝗜𝗥 𝗣𝗔𝗬𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧.

I support paying developers who fulfil their commitments. Terra Classic cannot demand professional development while refusing to honour legitimate funding commitments.

🔗 statsbin.com/governance/122…

#LUNC #USTC #TerraClassic #Hyperlane #Governance #CryptoDevelopment