Twitxy Saved

StratCommX

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@StratCommX

Keadilan, kemakmuran, perpaduan.
Putrajaya Joined June 2009
141 Following 22K Followers 113K Posts

Latest posts 5

StratCommX Verified account @StratCommX
Ini orang-orang tua dok kata, “dikejar tak dapat, yang dikendong berciciran.”

Padan muka UMNO N9. Bodoh sangat
Jai-yen @Jaiyen_nakal 19h
Siapa yang derhaka? UMNO.
Yang dikatanya derhaka? DAP
Yang keluarkan surat nak gulingkan Raja? UMNO
Yang tarik surat dari gulingkan Raja? UMNO

Maka bakal bercanang kononnya UMNO jadi hero selesakan kemelut.
View quoted post on X
1 replies 8 reposts 24 likes 1.1K views View on X
StratCommX Verified account @StratCommX
Shafie ni, 10 kes die amik, average 8 kalah, 2 menang. Tengoklah kes Najib, semua yg die defend kalah

Dalam legal world, he’s a joke. Ex judge n senior lawyer pun kata dia ni suka bullshit

Pentaksub najib and umno je angkat melebih2
0:59
Rangga Is Back Verified account @alif_haidar 4d
But jujur nak tanya sebagai orang awam.

As far as I know, Liyana Marzuki was a former DPP... so does that mean all the DPPs in this case don't practice law, Tan Sri?

Stupid argument for a defense lawyer...

but I get it,

but barely i can understand u lawyer cari makan utk penyokong UMNO…
View quoted post on X
10 replies 196 reposts 747 likes 36K views View on X
StratCommX Verified account @StratCommX
Baguslah ramai lawyer dah highlight dan be objective. Tolak tepi dulu bab Najib atau pro UMNO

Bahasa legal ni akan dijadikan precedent. Kalau tak firm, abislah orang akan jadikan rujukan pada situasi akan datang
I/O Verified account @ckliio9 Nov 7
The devil is entirely in the clerical details.

Punca utama AGC boleh "keliru" sbb registry mahkamah pergi guna bahasa standard template: "immediate discharge/release" lepas bayar denda. Perkataan "release" tu lah yang memberi ruang untuk AGC reka modal kata kes SRC dah selesai and guna alasan tu untuk sekat pelepasan sbb bimbangkan rantaian kes 1MDB.

My lawyer explained it perfectly to me, surat perintah mahkamah tu sepatutnya ditulis secara spesifik: "immediate release from Kajang Prison to the location of his house arrest, which is 11, Jalan Langgak Duta."

Kalau dari awal guna ayat pemindahan lokasi lokap macam ni, AGC tak ada modal langsung nak buat taktik melengah. KDN pun dah rasmi warta kediaman tu sebagai penjara sah bawah Akta Penjara. Pindah rumah maksudnya bertukar fasiliti tahanan jer, bukannya bebas terus. Kesilapan teknikal bahasa mahkamah ni yang jadi modal birokrasi nak main delaying game.

Was the technical mistake intentional or an honest mistake? Wallahualam.
View quoted post on X