Balanced discussion of CMR GUIDE ... there are nuanced signals for clinical practice in this data - that will resonate into thinking about SCD risk prediction tctmd.com/news/scarring-…
Anand Ganesan
@Vortexium32
Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology,Flinders Medical Centre | Head, Cardiac Signals Analysis Lab| Professor of Medicine, Flinders University, Australia
2.1K Following 1.8K Followers 993 Posts
Latest posts 5
Nuanced message about CMR GUIDE - this was very tough trial to do and execute.
The trial's primary endpoint wasn't positive - but it still has incredibly important signals about decreasing SCD, and role of ICD therapy in younger pts that we as EPs should think about
The trial's primary endpoint wasn't positive - but it still has incredibly important signals about decreasing SCD, and role of ICD therapy in younger pts that we as EPs should think about
💬 Editorial by Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS: Left ventricular ejection fraction alone may not adequately identify patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance may refine risk assessment in those w/ left ventricular ejection fraction >35%.View quoted post on X
🔗 ja.ma/4cjTyPw
#ESCCongress @escardio
#CMRGUIDE at #ESCCongressView quoted post on X
Should myocardial SCAR—not just EF—help determine who gets a primary-prevention ICD?
Patients with:
➡️ LVEF 36–50%
➡️ Ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy
➡️ Scar/fibrosis on CMR
Randomized 353 pt, impacted by COVID, 82% Men
⏱️6.3 y
ICD vs implantable loop recorder
Primary Endpoint= SCD or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia
🌟RESULTS:
Primary: SCD or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia
➡️ HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.37–1.58), P=.47 ❌
Sudden cardiac death alone:
➡️ HR 0.26 (0.07–0.95), P=.04
All-cause mortality:
➡️ HR 0.91 (0.49–1.71), P=.78
🫀 CMR-guided ICD implantation did not reduce the primary composite endpoint. The reduction in SCD is intriguing, but as a secondary endpoint in a negative trial it should be interpreted cautiously.
CMR scar alone does not yet appear sufficient to expand ICD indications beyond current EF-based criteria.
📄 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/… @JAMA_current
#WhyCMR #CardioTwitter #EPeeps #HeartFailure
Incredible effort by @josephselvacmr to complete this trial - the culmination of more than a decade of effort!
A huge milestone as a contribution to both the CMR and EP field.
A huge milestone as a contribution to both the CMR and EP field.
Among patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction of 36% to 50%, and myocardial scar on #CardiovascularMagneticResonance, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator did not significantly reduce sudden cardiac death or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia vs an implantable loop recorder. Rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure–related hospitalization were also similar between groups. #ESCCongress ja.ma/46rkSI4View quoted post on X
CMR GUIDE is key trial for the EP field - gives the first randomized data we have for the LVEF 36-50% population with myocardial scar.
The positive signal in younger pts, reductions in SCD rates are important and nuanced discussions to have with out pts about ICD therapy.
The positive signal in younger pts, reductions in SCD rates are important and nuanced discussions to have with out pts about ICD therapy.
Among patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction of 36% to 50%, and myocardial scar on #CardiovascularMagneticResonance, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator did not significantly reduce sudden cardiac death or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia vs an implantable loop recorder. Rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure–related hospitalization were also similar between groups. #ESCCongress ja.ma/4gvoZHOView quoted post on X