Twitxy Saved

Anand Ganesan

@Vortexium32

Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology,Flinders Medical Centre | Head, Cardiac Signals Analysis Lab| Professor of Medicine, Flinders University, Australia
Adelaide flinders.edu.au/people/anand.g… Joined June 2014
2.1K Following 1.8K Followers 993 Posts

Latest posts 5

Anand Ganesan @Vortexium32
Nuanced message about CMR GUIDE - this was very tough trial to do and execute.

The trial's primary endpoint wasn't positive - but it still has incredibly important signals about decreasing SCD, and role of ICD therapy in younger pts that we as EPs should think about
JAMA Verified account @JAMA_current Aug 28
💬 Editorial by Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS: Left ventricular ejection fraction alone may not adequately identify patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance may refine risk assessment in those w/ left ventricular ejection fraction >35%.

🔗 ja.ma/4cjTyPw

#ESCCongress @escardio
View quoted post on X
Anand Ganesan @Vortexium32
Really important to have nuanced messaging about these results..

#ESCCongress
#CMRGUIDE at #ESCCongress

Should myocardial SCAR—not just EF—help determine who gets a primary-prevention ICD?

Patients with:
➡️ LVEF 36–50%
➡️ Ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy
➡️ Scar/fibrosis on CMR

Randomized 353 pt, impacted by COVID, 82% Men
⏱️6.3 y
ICD vs implantable loop recorder

Primary Endpoint= SCD or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia

🌟RESULTS:
Primary: SCD or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia
➡️ HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.37–1.58), P=.47 ❌
Sudden cardiac death alone:
➡️ HR 0.26 (0.07–0.95), P=.04
All-cause mortality:
➡️ HR 0.91 (0.49–1.71), P=.78

🫀 CMR-guided ICD implantation did not reduce the primary composite endpoint. The reduction in SCD is intriguing, but as a secondary endpoint in a negative trial it should be interpreted cautiously.

CMR scar alone does not yet appear sufficient to expand ICD indications beyond current EF-based criteria.

📄 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/… @JAMA_current

#WhyCMR #CardioTwitter #EPeeps #HeartFailure
View quoted post on X
Anand Ganesan @Vortexium32
Incredible effort by @josephselvacmr to complete this trial - the culmination of more than a decade of effort!

A huge milestone as a contribution to both the CMR and EP field.
JAMA Verified account @JAMA_current Aug 28
Among patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction of 36% to 50%, and myocardial scar on #CardiovascularMagneticResonance, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator did not significantly reduce sudden cardiac death or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia vs an implantable loop recorder. Rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure–related hospitalization were also similar between groups. #ESCCongress ja.ma/46rkSI4
View quoted post on X
Anand Ganesan @Vortexium32
CMR GUIDE is key trial for the EP field - gives the first randomized data we have for the LVEF 36-50% population with myocardial scar.

The positive signal in younger pts, reductions in SCD rates are important and nuanced discussions to have with out pts about ICD therapy.
JAMA Verified account @JAMA_current Aug 28
Among patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction of 36% to 50%, and myocardial scar on #CardiovascularMagneticResonance, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator did not significantly reduce sudden cardiac death or hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia vs an implantable loop recorder. Rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure–related hospitalization were also similar between groups. #ESCCongress ja.ma/4gvoZHO
View quoted post on X