Twitxy Saved

Wᴀsʜ. U. L. Rᴇᴠ.

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@WashULRev

Washington University in St. Louis's premier legal journal since 1915. Tweets and Retweets are not endorsements.
St Louis, MO washulawreview.org Joined March 2016
450 Following 1K Followers 551 Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Wᴀsʜ. U. L. Rᴇᴠ. Verified account @WashULRev
You may notice something new…

The Washington University Law Review has a new look! Our redesigned website is now live, celebrating our tradition of legal scholarship since 1915.

Explore the new site: washulawreview.org
washulawreview.org Washington University Law Review | Legal Scholarship Since 1915 The Washington University Law Review is a student-edited journal publishing volumes of general legal scholarship, in print and online.
Wᴀsʜ. U. L. Rᴇᴠ. Verified account @WashULRev
Volume 104, Issue 1 is now published.

The Issue brings together scholarship examining consequential questions across trusts and estates, criminal law, securities regulation, corporate governance, and criminal punishment. Through empirical inquiry, institutional analysis, and innovative legal proposals, these five pieces challenge prevailing assumptions and offer new frameworks for understanding pressing questions in law and policy.

Read Volume 104, Issue 1 below: washulawreview.org/volume/volume-…
washulawreview.org Volume 104 Archives - Washington University Law Review Browse Volume 104 of the Washington University Law Review.
Wᴀsʜ. U. L. Rᴇᴠ. Verified account @WashULRev
New in Washington University Law Review Online Volume 104: "Shadow Tariffs and the Executive Volatility Regime" by Doron Narotzki (@DNarotzki).

The Article introduces the concept of "shadow tariffs," arguing that executive tariff volatility can impose real economic costs by prompting businesses to reprice risk, rewrite contracts, and delay investment, even when threatened tariffs are never collected.

Read here: wustllawreview.org/2026/08/02/sha…
Wᴀsʜ. U. L. Rᴇᴠ. Verified account @WashULRev
Domenic Monteleone’s "One-Person, One-Initiative: Equal Protection Limits on Missouri's Proposed District-Based Initiative Approval Rule" argues Missouri's Amendment 4, which would require citizen-led constitutional amendments to win a majority in each of the state's eight congressional districts, violates the Equal Protection Clause.

The piece is forthcoming in Volume 104. Given Amendment 4’s Aug. 4 election date, we are releasing it early online.

Read it here: wustllawreview.org