V e r i f y o

Our Finextra interview is now live.

Victor Mendez (CMO, Verifyo) and John Cavebring (CIO, Verifyo) break down why zero-knowledge proof is becoming the new gold standard for KYC, and how you can meet stronger compliance expectations without creating a bigger “data honeypot.”

Inside the piece:

what tokenised attributes look like in practice

why this matters more once wallets enter the picture

the breach scenarios most teams don’t model properly

If you’re building KYC/AML infrastructure, this is worth the read. (link below)

Every Verifyo vs Veriff comparison ranks accuracy and speed. Wrong axis. The axis that matters is what each flow retains on your servers after onboarding. A thread on architecture, not scoreboards. ↓

A passed liveness check feels like proof. It is a signal, not a verdict.

Four presentation attacks, three detection modalities, one gap no single detector closes. A short decode. ↓

Every identity document a CASP warehouses to prove it did its job is also a liability.

The MiCA compliance record you keep to satisfy your supervisor is the same record a single breach turns into a catastrophe.

A thread on the onboarding honeypot.

Most 'Top 10 KYC providers' lists sort on logos, country coverage, and price-per-check. The question that decides the contract comes first: what does each vendor's API actually return on a verified user — the document itself, or a proof it happened?