ZenomTrader

This account is verified. Learn more

@ZenomTrader

Managing $4,900,000 in funded capital! 2-year verified track record! Sharing my growth! Private investor capital! AI/Tech/Inventor/Promethean!

whop.com/zenomtrader-pr… Joined January 2024

362 Following 14K Followers 5.3K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

ZenomTrader @ZenomTrader May 15

#1 Sharpe ratio trader / prop trader from Romania.

1.68 Sharpe, 19.91% annualized return, 8.50% max drawdown.

Verified track record: €952,961.16 AuM, invest in RIAG here (36% capacity):
darwinexzero.com/darwin/RIAG/pe…

All Weather approach applied to CFDs with a shorter time horizon, long + short.

Good diversification compared to the usual CTA approach.

Currently negotiating another €1M AuM deal + a €3M starting AuM hedge fund opportunity.

CAGR: 47.6%(Darwinex Signal account)
Max drawdown: 14.7%(Darwinex Signal account)

$315,000+ in verified profit across prop firms.

The only premium community in the industry focused on AI agents, with verified track record traders + an autonomous teaching course trained on my exact framework and data, my second brain (The AI Doppelganger).

22 strategies (Forum Strategies), 2 autonomous backtesting tools, TradingView Stellar template with GitHub access, secret War Rooms.

Not for lazy people/beginners who expect a plug and play solution!

Learning algo trading takes time.

whop.com/joined/zenomtr…

Annual plan: 44% off
whop.com/checkout/1PJ44…

ZenomTrader @ZenomTrader 7h

Stopping after a normal losing streak is one of the main reasons people lose money.

Combine that with following the wrong people and having unrealistic expectations, and you end up believing that losing streaks aren't normal, that they somehow make you a bad trader.

So I had Claude run the math.

With a target twice the size of your stop, you break even by winning one trade out of three, before costs.

At one trade a day, a typical year brings 11 consecutive losses.

Streaks of 10 or more happen in roughly three out of four years, and streaks of 16 or more occur in about one year out of ten.

Then I started the same trading plan on every trading day from 2018 to 2026.

Same trades, same rules.

For half of those starting dates, the first payout came in about 4 days. For the unluckiest starting date, it took 202 days.

Most traders would call that second person a bad trader.

They're not. They just started on the wrong day, and most would have given up before the math had a chance to play out.

**A losing streak isn't automatically a signal to stop. It's part of the distribution.**

The real mistake is abandoning a statistically validated edge simply because you're experiencing a perfectly normal outcome.

7:12

ZenomTrader @ZenomTrader 1d

I'm willing to undergo verification at any point.

I have payout certificates from the firm and a public Darwinex track record that anyone can access.

You have books published as well, so what's the problem?

Rob Carver @investingidiocy 1d

@Nonames_for_me @ZenomTrader That can't possibly be true because he is showing us an account curve, definitely legit.
View quoted post on X

ZenomTrader @ZenomTrader 1d

+1,130% ROI on my initial investment with Vest Markets so far.

- $39,298.17 in payouts
- $24,993.72 in expenses
- $14,304.45 in net profit

Still only $1,265.85 out of my own pocket.

Everything else has been reinvested profits.

Just a week ago, I was at $27,151.74 in payouts and $10,311.64 in net profit.

285 payouts so far.

Pretty good for just five weeks.

Use code ZENOM for the maximum available discount.

ZenomTrader @ZenomTrader 2d

Live performance so far, based on one month of data.

Not quite a Sharpe ratio of 14, but still incredibly high.

And no, I never said the capacity was extraordinary.

You can't have results like these and infinite capacity at the same time.

The real alpha is at low capacity, and it has absolutely zero correlation with my real trading accounts or my DARWIN.

My newest model has been improved over the last two weeks, so there's still room for the Sharpe ratio to go even higher.

ZenomTrader Verified account @ZenomTrader 3d

Most traders ask me why I'm still trading with prop firms when I could just trade my own capital.

Because passing up an opportunity like this would be stupid.

Prop firms are a mathematical game, and when played correctly, they can offer a Sharpe ratio of 14.

Pure alpha that doesn't depend on market conditions.

Trending, chopping, crashing markets it doesn't matter, because the edge isn't in predicting the market.

It's in exploring the rules of the game itself.

Can I trade my own capital? Of course.

But the Sharpe ratio there would probably be around 10% of that, and the returns would still be correlated with the market to some extent.

Every strategy that trades a real market carries some exposure to that market.

You can diversify it, reduce position sizes, apply filters, but you can never completely eliminate that exposure.

So the real question isn't prop firms versus personal capital.

It's why anyone would leave a Sharpe ratio of 14 on the table just because it doesn't look like "real trading."

Real trading is whatever generates the highest return per unit of risk taken.

View quoted post on X