JCH01BNB

The key to Global Finance is terra-luna:native

Remember what CZ said.
Kwon had the right idea, he just failed to execute.

LunaStrikeForceBNB is here to support the community, Binance, and your investment.

We appreciate each and every coin you stake with us.

Here are a few of the communities best handles to follow.

@Holyfunsacks

@ThanhVan007

@Rabbeltje79

@TereTan8899

@tonykal57853

@Teckbro_

@Agus174174

@eddierichie37

@JavonTM1

@Younguncrypto

@IssaTonde226

@bro99_mas

@summervibesBNB

@FelineFortune_

@BigM4332

@VanessaaVivid

@kimmyboy2

@TonWestgate888

@yunemmektebi

@Yaman853397

@BigM4332

@air100457166

@LUNCboy01

@Moms5868Moms

@Beast66122

@HannahR20173268

@MaWaLUNC

@GPS8380

@coffee_latte00

@Bucks_oufc

@cumhachtanpx

@salmanjoyia139

@Greenpeace06_09

@CorvetteC8Z06

@lunckat

@gimsulyeon60996

@_JCH01

@worldnewthings

@salmanjoyia139

@william_gearing

@RobinTheFarmer

@TerraClassic_

@TimWasher17

@dodds_brett

@mat5088

@MartinK270981

@moad_issa

@Jav7719

Do you want to be added to this shout out list. DM me

Have you checked out Luncblast.com
Made free to play for everyone. Please join this community.

Do you need a Hog to help you win free LUNC. DM me x.com/i/communities/…

I've reviewed Terra Luna Classic Governance Proposal #12236, and I have some serious technical concerns

I was asked by the creator of this proposal to not reach back out so respecting his wishes, perhaps someone can help me get the answers to these questions and concerns.

Does this proposal strengthen the Terra Classic blockchain for everyone, or does it give special privileges to a small group of developers?

My initial assessment is that the proposal primarily benefits the specifically named development team, while offering a potential but not yet demonstrated benefit to the broader blockchain.

That doesn't automatically make it malicious. However, I believe the community should demand stronger safeguards before approving it.

1. What Proposal #12236 actually does
The proposal is titled:
Allow Juris Protocol and LuncSwap.fun (LSF) to Upload CosmWasm Code.
It requests changing the blockchain's x/wasm code_upload_access setting:
CURRENT
Nobody
No ordinary wallet can upload new CosmWasm code
PROPOSED
AnyOfAddresses
One named wallet receives upload permission
The designated wallet is described as belonging to Bumeo, who deploys security fixes for Juris Protocol and LuncSwap.fun.
This would allow that wallet to upload new CosmWasm contract code without requesting governance approval for each upload.
Importantly, the permission is for uploading code, not automatically deploying or executing it. Those are separate operations with their own controls.
That distinction matters when evaluating the actual security risk.
2. What I found after reviewing the developer's explanation
I located the detailed discussion supporting this proposal. There is more substance behind the request than the screenshot alone reveals.
According to the published technical documentation:
The designated wallet previously uploaded 18 code versions.
Juris Protocol operates lending, borrowing, and liquidation infrastructure.
Some contracts have undergone multiple upgrades.
Major contract migrations are controlled by a three-member DAO requiring two approvals.
The developers argue that waiting seven days for every security update is unacceptable.
These are legitimate operational considerations.
A vulnerability in a lending protocol can expose users' funds. Developers sometimes need to deploy fixes immediately.
I agree with their argument for faster emergency security updates. I do not automatically agree that one wallet should receive unrestricted, indefinite upload privileges.

3. My technical assessment

Consideration Assessment
Faster security updates Positive
Continued DeFi development Positive
Equal treatment of developers Concern
Concentration of upload privileges Concern
Independent code auditing Not demonstrated
Governance oversight Partial
Automatic expiration of permission Not specified.

More…

Just wanted to say, Thank You. 🙏