Twitxy Saved

Jeff

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@_Jeffery0

clipping šŸ’ˆšŸŽ¬
Remote Joined December 2023
987 Following 26K Followers 5.5K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Jeff Verified account @_Jeffery0
Piers Morgan Challenges a Non-Binary Guest to Explain Their Identity — The Debate Takes an Awkward Turn

Piers Morgan: I just want to ask, what do you mean by non-binary?

Non-Binary Guest: When I say I’m non-binary, I’m expressing my identity in a way that I have the right to do.

Piers Morgan: What are your pronouns?

Non-Binary Guest: They/them.

Piers Morgan: What does that mean? The collective ā€œtheyā€ has been used to refer to individual people for centuries.

Non-Binary Guest: I honestly don’t understand the concept of what non-binary means, or why you would use a plural pronoun to describe a single person.

Piers Morgan: If you don’t understand what non-binary means, I’m not sure you’re in a position to lead a debate.

Non-Binary Guest: Then tell me. Tell me.

Piers Morgan: If you can’t explain it in simple language, what’s the point?

Non-Binary Guest: My gender identity is something other than man or woman. I’m a non-binary individual.

Piers Morgan: But you accept you’re a female?

Non-Binary Guest: I don’t think I’m here to discuss the contents of my underpants. I don’t think that’s appropriate.

Piers Morgan: You said, ā€œI’m trans.ā€

Non-Binary Guest: This has really become uncomfortably personal. If you think this is uncomfortable, try undressing in a locker room with a 6-foot-4 naked man.

Piers Morgan: Right. Exactly. That’s the point of this. It’s like, what is uncomfortable?

Other Guest: I’m having a conversation here, and I’m slightly offended because no one asked me my pronouns.

Piers Morgan: Exactly. I think we should get rid of all pronouns. I think they’re ridiculous.
2:05
171 replies 514 reposts 7.9K likes 1.7M views View on X
Jeff Verified account @_Jeffery0
Stephen A. Smith DEMANDS to Know How One Senator Can Take on Washington — Abdul El-Sayed Blames the Billionaires and Corporations Buying Politicians

Stephen A. Smith: Why are you the best candidate for Michigan, and why should you be in the United States Senate?

Abdul El-Sayed: My entire career has been about taking care of people. I trained as a doctor, but I realised the healthcare system was often part of the problem.

People were being denied healthcare because they couldn’t afford it in the richest country in the world.

In public health, I rebuilt Detroit’s health department, took on corporate polluters, eliminated medical debt, provided free health insurance and made sure children weren’t exposed to lead after the Flint water crisis.

I’m running because Trump isn’t the disease. He’s the worst symptom of it. The real problem is that corporations, billionaires and special interests can buy politicians to serve them instead of us.

We’re fighting to get money out of politics, put money in people’s pockets and pass Medicare for All.

Stephen A. Smith: How are you going to change the system when you’re just one of 100 senators?

Abdul El-Sayed: It’s not just about having one vote. It’s about the platform you carry and the conversation you create.

I’ve never taken corporate money, and I’m going to the Senate to fight for union rights, guaranteed healthcare and against monopolies and corporations that charge us too much and pay us too little.

People should be asking, ā€œWhy can’t I have a senator who actually fights the corporations making life unaffordable?ā€

It’s about changing the conversation with the other 99 senators, but also with the 350 million Americans who elect us.
2:52
6 replies 8 reposts 34 likes 5.8K views View on X
Jeff Verified account @_Jeffery0
Gay Pastor Says Homosexuality Is NOT a Sin — Another Christian Speaker Immediately Fires Back: ā€œIt’s Definitely a Sinā€

Interviewer: Would you classify homosexuality as a sin?

Gay Pastor: I wouldn’t classify homosexuality as a sin any more than heterosexuality. The Bible is not a guide to human sexuality, and we do violence to it when we try to make it one.

Sin means missing the mark. For me, living honestly and authentically as someone attracted to the same sex is not missing the mark. We have to be careful not to paint everyone with the same brush.

Interviewer: But isn’t it dangerous to let everyone decide their own standard of right and wrong? Someone could argue that they’re naturally attracted to children. Would that make it acceptable for them?

Gay Pastor: No. There’s a major difference between a relationship involving two consenting adults who love and respect each other and an adult sexually exploiting a child. One involves mutual consent; the other causes harm. We cannot equate the two.

Interviewer: Marcus, is homosexuality a sin?

Marcus: I certainly don’t believe it is. I don’t believe homosexuality or same-sex romantic relationships within a covenant are sinful.

Moderator: Marcus, what about you? Is homosexuality a sin?

Marcus Rogers : It’s definitely a sin. The Bible is the guide for everything, including sexuality.
5:35
4 replies 2 reposts 22 likes 3.6K views View on X
Jeff Verified account @_Jeffery0
Piers Morgan CONFRONTS Russell Brand With His 20-Year-Old Admission About Women — Brand Now Calls His Past Behaviour ā€œEvilā€

Piers takes Brand back to a 2006 GQ interview, when he was 31.

Piers Morgan: ā€œI asked you halfway through, ā€˜Are you a more successful sexual predator now that you don’t drink?ā€™ā€

ā€œYou replied, ā€˜Yes, but I resent the word predator. I like to think of myself as a conduit of natural forces.ā€™ā€

ā€œYou just have to remove all the reasons why women don’t actually go through with it, like pride and reputation. You just have to unpick the conditions stopping women going straight to bed with you.ā€

Russell Brand: ā€œThat sounds like charm, seduction, game.ā€

ā€œI regard it as evil, in a word.ā€

Piers Morgan: ā€œI think fame can be one of the most insidious drugs of all.ā€

Russell Brand: ā€œCertainly it is.ā€
3:55
22 replies 30 reposts 183 likes 198K views View on X
Jeff Verified account @_Jeffery0
Mehdi Hasan ACCUSES the Media of a Double Standard on Muslims — Then Uses Bernie Madoff to Make His Point to Piers Morgan

Piers Morgan: FBI figures show that nearly 70% of US religion-based hate crimes in 2025 targeted Jews. Although Jews make up just 2.4% of the population, they account for around 60% of religious hate crimes.

In the UK, hate crimes against Muslims are also reportedly almost twice as likely to result in prosecution as those against Jews.

Taken together, these figures suggest more hate crimes against Jews than Muslims. What would you say to that?

Mehdi Hasan: I’m not interested in a victim Olympics. There are far too many hate crimes across the board, and I’m against all forms of hatred and bigotry.

But two things can be true: antisemitic hate crimes are a serious problem, and anti-Muslim hatred is being mainstreamed and normalised in this country.

Republicans in Congress have held numerous hearings on antisemitism, but not a single specific hearing on Islamophobia.

Piers Morgan: There are people who are concerned about antisemitism too.

Mehdi Hasan: Of course. But there’s also a campaign to deny that Islamophobia even exists.

People don’t just criticise Islamic beliefs or teachings. They openly express hatred towards Muslims as people. That’s Islamophobia.

Look at how crimes are described. We talk about ā€œIslamic rape gangsā€ or ā€œMuslim terrorists.ā€ But we don’t define other crimes by the perpetrator’s religion.

If I came on this show and called Bernie Madoff a Jewish financier who robbed people, you’d rightly say that was antisemitic.

Yet when a Muslim commits a crime, their religion is often made part of the headline.

That’s the double standard I’m talking about.
4:56