Twitxy Saved

Campbell

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@abcampbell

macro stoic
the world of dollars campbellramble.ai Joined August 2011
2.2K Following 99K Followers 12K Posts

Latest posts 5

Campbell Verified account @abcampbell
re: automation

usually the human isn’t directly replaced by the machine

usually a human gets fired during a recession

and their work is split between a machine and the remaining humans

which is when productivity (aka output/jobs) goes 📈

output doesn’t go down, jobs do
John Arnold Verified account @johnarnold 2d
This is the common AI experience I hear from non-tech, small biz CEOs. They're paying for AI for many/all of their white collar workers. They can describe a few tasks where AI blows them away and the benefits are substantive. When asked whether AI can do a full job rather than a specific task, they say 'it's not there yet.' They haven't laid off workers but some haven't backfilled a position in a division like finance. They're optimistic about the future value of AI to their businesses.
 
The big question I leave with is whether:
 1) AI can already perform entire jobs, but management and employees at most companies haven't figured out how to maximize its use.
2) Today's models aren't very capable of performing entire jobs at most companies, but future models will be.
3) AI has a more fundamental limitation in that it can automate individual tasks but has limited ability to replace most jobs.
View quoted post on X