An Abstract Self-Portrait

Hello. I think you should 'meta'-think outside 'meta', and 'meta'-think outside 'meta'-meta', and 'meta'-think outside 'meta'-meta'-meta', and 'meta'-think outside 'meta'-meta'-meta'-meta'. And one should 'meta'-think 'outside' 'meta'-ad infinitum (not only 'meta'-think 'meta'-ad infinitum but also 'meta'-think 'outside' 'meta'-ad infinitum). One should not only 'meta'-think 'meta'-ad infinitum but also 'meta'-think 'outside' 'meta'-ad infinitum.

Hello. I have another 'meta'-idea: perhaps one should not only 'meta'-think 'outside all boxes' but also 'meta'-think 'outside all meta-boxes' (i.e. 'outside all meta-boxes of meta-boxes'). I think such an idea would seem 'meta' not only because it 'transcends' or 'lies beyond' 'meta'-thinking 'outside all boxes' but because it 'transcends' or 'lies beyond' 'meta'-thinking 'itself'.

Hello. I have an idea of my own: perhaps one should 'meta'-think not only 'outside the box' and 'meta'-think not only 'outside the box of boxes' but also 'meta'-think 'outside the box of boxes of boxes'. In other words, perhaps one should 'meta'-think not only 'outside the box' and not only 'outside the box of boxes', but 'outside all boxes'. I think such an idea would seem 'meta' not only because it 'transcends' or 'lies beyond' 'meta'-thinking 'outside the box' and 'meta'-thinking 'outside the box of boxes' (and 'meta'-learning and 'meta'-doing and 'meta'-creating 'outside the box' and 'meta'-learning and 'meta'-doing and 'meta'-creating 'outside the box of boxes') but because it 'transcends' or 'lies beyond' 'meta'-thinking and 'meta'-learning and 'meta'-doing and 'meta'-creating 'themselves'.

hello everyone!

"Occam's razor" seems more like a 'tool for shaving away unnecessary complexity' than a 'tool for shaving away unnecessary simplicity' (since I think that 'complexity' and 'simplicity' have more in common with each other than either does with 'unnecessary complexity' or 'unnecessary simplicity'), but I think that 'Occam's razor' should seem more like a 'rule of thumb' than a 'law of thought'. 'Occam's razor' could perhaps seem a 'useful starting point' or 'useful assumption' or 'useful first approximation' in some cases, but I think it should not seem 'absolute' or 'unbreakable' or 'unassailable' or 'beyond all doubt' (or 'not to be questioned' or 'not to be doubted') in all cases.