Twitxy Saved

Eztainutlacatl

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@cbkwgl

A jack of all trades still trying to understand what he is a master of. Tech alter ego - @greybeardcrank. Princely States - amazon.in/dp/B09LPD4NYQ
cbkwgl1.substack.com Joined January 2016
1.1K Following 14K Followers 123K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Eztainutlacatl Verified account @cbkwgl
In a personal mail I received in 2008, Michael Witzel noted,
While we say that the Harappan (Indus) Civilization did not have writing (and thus was functionally “illiterate”) its people were anything but “illiterate” in the sense of uncivilized. The myths depicted on their tiny tablets indicate a complex religion and its oral literature.
NB: It is not a great shame if a civilization does not have a script: The Incas, Aztecs-Toltecs-Olmecs did not have one, neither the civilizations close to the Indus: Those of Jiroft, Mundigak, and the BMAC (Bactria-Margiana Archeological Complex, 2400-1600 BCE).
Script is an ingredient of the early great civilizations, but not a necessary one.

This is an insincere argument. Incas had quipu which acted as a script. Aztecs and Olmecs used pictographic scripts while it is possible that Toltecs, who existed only for two centuries didn't evolve into a full state with a working bureaucracy. On the other hand, it is fully established that Jiroft, Mundigak and BMAC are periphery for Indus - if Indus didn't use script according to Witzel, how can it's periphery be? Further more, can one use absence of script in periphery be used as a basis to argue core didn't have a script? More even so, fully knowing they are minor entities as compared to Indus Valley, what exactly is the use case for a script for those entities in an era where civilized life itself is hard to find? Further more, it is an interesting intellectual exercise as to how a civilization which covered more than a million sq km, and survived for millennia maintained the commonality and ran an empire without a script? Even more so, when Elam and Sumer had script, what explains the fact that Indus Valley rejected one of the most useful inventions of mankind?
2 replies 4 reposts 18 likes 1.5K views View on X
Eztainutlacatl Verified account @cbkwgl
Is the problem here a Brahmin becoming an OBC or a Hindu converting?
x.com/imranhindu/sta…
Mohamed Imranullah S Verified account @imranhindu 15h
Justices G.R. Swaminathan and M.D. Sumathi of #MadrasHighCourt decide to examine whether converts to Christianity would be entitled to claim MBC status. "Petitioner counsel startled us by asserting that if a Brahmin gets converted and joins CSI denomination, he can enjoy OBC status as per present statutory framework. If the assertion is true, then a serious re-think is certainly called for," they say.
View quoted post on X
Eztainutlacatl Verified account @cbkwgl
And they say Karma is a...
x.com/TheGentsGuild/…
The Gentlemen's Guild Verified account @TheGentsGuild 1d
In 1915, Rudyard Kipling's only son, John, wanted to join the war effort. The army turned him down because of his poor eyesight, so Kipling pulled some strings and got him a commision with the Irish Guards.

Weeks after his 18th birthday, John went missing at the Battle of Loos.

Kipling and his wife searched high and low, but never found him or an answer to what happened.

From 1917, Kipling helped the Imperial War Graves Commission decide what to place on the graves of the many thousands of soldiers who could not be identified. They came up with:

"A Soldier of the Great War. Known unto God."

He wrote it for other men's sons and his own.

Sadly, Kipling died in 1936 without ever learning where John lay.
View quoted post on X