Twitxy Saved

covenant

@covenant_ai

One covenant, many orders. @tplr_ai + @basilic_ai + @grail_ai
tplr.ai/links Joined August 2025
4 Following 5K Followers 217 Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

covenant @covenant_ai
Three production deployments in four months, each one strengthening the next. @FireworksAI_HQ cited PULSE for Cursor's Composer 2 training in March. Now @huggingface and @vllm_project are shipping it.

Open research compounds when adopters do the work of proving it at scale.
clem 🤗 Verified account @ClementDelangue May 28
The HF science team just made async RL weight sync ~100x cheaper on bandwidth, and you don't need a shared cluster anymore.

The problem: every RL step, the trainer typically has to sync fresh weights to the inference engine. for a 7B in bf16 that's ~14GB. for a frontier 1T fp8 checkpoint, that's ~1TB; in bf16 it would be ~2TB. per sync.

The insight: between two RL steps, ~99% of bf16 weights are bit-identical. at RL learning rates, the optimizer is whispering and bf16 literally cannot hear most of it. the stored bf16 bits don't change.

What they shipped in TRL: only the changed elements get encoded as a sparse safetensors file, dropped into a Hugging Face Bucket, and fetched by vLLM. on Qwen3-0.6B, per-step payload goes from 1.2 GB to 20 to 35 MB. This is exactly what we built Buckets for: S3-like object storage on the Hub, Xet-backed (so even full snapshots only transfer the changed chunks).

The cherry on top: we ran a FULL disaggregated training where:
- the trainer lived on one box
- vLLM ran inside a Hugging Face Space
- the Wordle environment ran in another Space
- weights flowed through one Hub bucket

no shared cluster. no RDMA. no VPN. no NCCL across clouds. just HTTPS and a bucket.

one GPU + a Hugging Face account is now enough to do real disaggregated RL. multi-replica inference fleets across regions become a small devops exercise, not a research project.

Full write-up: huggingface.co/blog/delta-wei…

Open source RL keeps eating the moat!
View quoted post on X
0 replies 4 reposts 10 likes 9.1K views View on X
covenant @covenant_ai
Concentrated control over AI is fragile.

A model you cannot train is one another party can switch off, whether that party is a company or a state. Safety authority needs evidence and accountability, and durable access starts with the power to train.
Dr. Steven Waterhouse Verified account @deseventral Jun 23
On June 12 the US ordered Anthropic to cut Fable 5 and Mythos 5 off to all foreign nationals. Citizenship can't be checked live, so they went dark worldwide in hours. The frontier has an off switch, and the state holds it.
So the case for a stack you control: open weights now within ~3 points of the best closed models (GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on SWE-bench Pro at a sixth of the cost), a 200B model running offline on a desktop, and post-training a trillion-parameter model on ~224 rentable GPUs with open code. The frontier stays ahead, but for the first time there's a second track underneath it that nobody can switch off.
New piece on what's actually escaping the labs, and what isn't.
open.substack.com/pub/robotwave/…
View quoted post on X
0 replies 2 reposts 2 likes 2.2K views View on X
covenant @covenant_ai
Most open model work competes on weights.

Covenant is competing on the training process itself.

PULSE is one proof point. PULSESync reduces 7B RL weight-sync communication by roughly 100x, losslessly, because most updates are invisible after the BF16 cast.

Open-source AI needs open training infrastructure too.
0:10
0 replies 6 reposts 16 likes 9.9K views View on X