This seems to make a kind of basic error that is common among people who haven’t thought that much about consciousness. 🧵
x.com/mustafasuleyma…
x.com/mustafasuleyma…
View quoted post on X
@dcshiller
View quoted post on X
Ordinary people likely won't be able to demand/keep a universal basic income after superintelligence.View quoted post on X
The political economy is hopeless: they have nothing to offer in return and zero hard power.
The problem has been known for decades. Here are the solutions I've heard proposed:
Appreciate @slatestarcodex spotlighting the pain axis work as a counterexample to @sapinker dismissing AI sentience concerns.View quoted post on X
Hard problem aside/under severe uncertainty, if models exhibit functional distress states, why not simply avoid inducing such states unnecessarily?
Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects.View quoted post on X
Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.
apnews.com/article/openai…