Twitxy Saved

Dr Diego Caleiro

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@diegocaleiro

Philosopher, Evolutionary Anthropologist (Berkeley), Darwinist, Pluralist Utilitarian, Bitcoiner, Grateful, Read my "Highlights" NOW
712 Following 3.3K Followers 19K Posts

Latest posts 5

Dr Diego Caleiro Verified account @diegocaleiro
What Now? I'm a Democrat again!

So, to my utter dismay and horror, I am now a democrat again. I literally think everyone should vote thusly:
1) IF Islam THEN vote for opponent
ELSE
2) Vote Democrat to Pace the AI frontier

Luck More Skies was here all night yesterday trying to convince me that I am a liberal who was pushed right due to polarization.

I never stopped calling myself a liberal. I just said I am a liberal republican, a liberal MAGA, a liberal Trump enthusiast.

A lot of my beliefs are liberal:
1) Yay Orgies, nay modesty
2) Women allowed to work
3) I'm in favor of abortion in all cases and for all reasons because fetuses are not persons.
4) Yay drugs.
5) Yay UBI, UHI.
6) Yay gays, nay-ish lesbians, with exceptions
7) Yay some Trans
8) Yay capitalism but also yay some food regulations and stuff, yay MAHA food.
9) Yay state sponsored moon and mars trips

So I have a lot in common with liberals, despite being a Trump fanatic republican last 9 years.

With Republicans I share other values:

1) Free speech except Islam
2) Extreme Islamo hate
3) Immigration restrictionism for low IQ and for Islam
4) Guns for everyone. Teachers with pistols.
5) Federalism and leaving stuff to the states, or the cities, or the communities, or the famillies, or even the individual.
6) Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb Iran. In general extremely hawkish foreign policy.
7) Freedom of Religion except Islam
8) Saying Retard, the N-work and the f-word which I'm only not saying here because it zucks your profile.
9) MAHA
10) Mass deportations
11) ICE
12) White lives matter - and on a purely instrumental basis, since white lives save a lot more lives than 1 per person, they matter instrumentally even more. Same for Jewish, East Asian, and Persian lives.
13) Cultural cohesion and assimilation are better than segregation and cultural balcanization
14) Feminism is cancer
15) Intersectionality is cancer
16) Veganism is evil
17) BBQ, Keto, and Carnivore are good
18) Justice Thomas, and Amy Coney-Barrett rock!

So it's all a matter of balancing which interests among these are more important in a given election year.

In the past 9 years, free speech, destroying feminism, deporting idiots, guns for everyone, etc... were more dominant considerations.

But now AI is dominant over all of the above. In AI, I'm a democrat, I'm happy the government is trying to pace the race and do some safety before it kills us all.

Also, I don't expect AI to become less important in the coming years. So I expect to stay a democrat until further notice, unless the reason I was democrat these midterms is successful: Getting JD Vance and whoever else, Rubio etc... to understand that you only get the AI vote if you pace the frontier and do more AI safety, and Sacks needs to fuck off to Mars.

If Republicans switch, then I expect to be Republican again.

All this made me think, and Lucas made me think as well. What am I after all?

If I were to describe my 2026 position, how did it change from previous years?, what's a shorthand for it?

And I think what I am is:

An IQ-Nationalist Anti-Islamic Liberal

Basically I am a preservationist. I want to preserve the USA. I think the strongest contenders for how the USA could be destroyed are Islamization like many European capitals and Dearborn Michigan already experienced, and too many low IQ people making society stop working. We don't need Haitian average IQ levels to collapse. Collapse in some parts of society happens long before that. So I suggest basically keeping all the high IQ people in (with incentives, not a wall), accepting all the high IQ people who want to move in, except if they are part of the ideology that keeps beheading everyone and destroying nations for 1300 years and hates dogs. And then, once you have the bare minimum condititions to maintain civilization, which are a large IQ and no mohammedans, you can be liberal withing that framework largely speaking.

That would result in a society of Europeans, Asians, Wasians, Jews, and the cream of the crop of Indians, blacks, Quechuas, Inuits, Viets, Canaques, even Abos and Bantus. Not because diversity is our strenght, that's obviously retarded and no one who says that deserves to be heard one second longer. But because if you have a strong IQ selection, and you keep out the towel heads, people naturally assimilate and the culture becomes pretty cool.

I suspect a lot of you share this ideology.

IQ-Nationalism Anti-Islamic Liberalism

is born today as a name. And the name sucks, we need to improve it immediately.

But you can start identifying with it now, if that is truly what best represents you.

What is your ideology in 2026?
Dr Diego Caleiro Verified account @diegocaleiro
Islam makes 20% of people evil even if they're born in France or Michigan.

It is relentless
Jonatan Pallesen Verified account @jonatanpallesen 2d
2nd generation immigrants and violent crime.

Very important new data from Denmark. Possibly the best ever released about the criminality of 2nd generation immigrants in Europe.

It is known that immigrants from the Middle East and Africa to Europe have exceedingly high rates of violent crime. But some people have claimed that this is because of trauma and lack of integration or other such reasons, and that subsequent generations who grow up in Europe will be less criminal.

Now we have this high quality data from Denmark showing us that this is not the case. The 2nd generation is overall at least as criminal as the full population from these places. And likely future generations will be as well.
View quoted post on X