Twitxy Saved

../*

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@dotdotslashstar

taking walks through pdf's. testing how far the playback speed slider can go. if i'm wrong lmk.
NY Joined September 2018
1.2K Following 576 Followers 2.7K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

../* Verified account @dotdotslashstar
Chat, you may have seen the "black excellence" / "white mediocrity" quotes from Judge Ada Brown (currently suspended pending investigation) but the full hearing transcript has so much more 1/n
Jacqueline Thomsen @jacq_thomsen Oct 28
New: A lawyer’s misconduct complaint against US District Judge Ada Brown stemmed from a hearing during which she repeatedly directed racial insults at him, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg Law.

news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/te…
View quoted post on X
51 replies 222 reposts 1.9K likes 176K views View on X
../* Verified account @dotdotslashstar
A "court order" submitted to Google purporting to order removal of Google Maps listings of a California bail bond company. For failing to have a California license. From a Kansas court.

Unlike the usual fake orders that try to remove bad reviews, this one is attempting to remove the (highly rated!) listings of, presumably, a competitor.

Interesting choice to pick an unrelated jurisdiction (a random spot almost in the middle of the US?). The cover page is a faithful reproduction of one from this court, the name of the judge fits. Why bother will all that if the case number doesn't exist and the writing is nonsense?
1 replies 2 reposts 9 likes 2.1K views View on X
../* Verified account @dotdotslashstar
Jane Doe asked for an extra *60 days* to respond to Sarabia's motion to dismiss, which he immediately opposed.

Doe's counsel claim they "simply need more time to properly respond" to the "complex issues of law". But their actual arguments are mostly about the potential convenience of responding to everyone else's MTDs at the same time. 1/2
Lauren Conlin Verified account @conlin_lauren Oct 26
NEW🚨 Another big filing in the 'CORNELL SEVEN' Case:

Diego Sarabia (one of the 'seven') is asking the judge to dismiss Jane Doe's sexual assault lawsuit against him entirely, arguing that her own nearly 600-paragraph complaint does not specifically accuse him of rape. In a 16-page filing, Sarabia's attorneys argue that Doe identifies only two alleged acts involving him: grabbing her face and kissing her without consent, and joining other fraternity members in pouring lines of ketamine onto her body and snorting the drug. His lawyers say that Doe does not specifically accuse Sarabia of penetration, touching her intimate body parts, supplying drugs or participating in the alleged sexual encounters involving other defendants. They argue that Doe's complaint improperly lumps all seven men together under accusations of rape without differentiating what each allegedly did.

Sarabia's attorneys also argue that the claims against him are barred by New York's one-year statute of limitations and don't qualify for the extended 20-year period to certain sexual offenses. They also state that Sarabia had no legal duty to supervise or protect Doe from other adult students.

Sarabia, who denies the allegations, wants the claims dismissed with prejuidice.
View quoted post on X
3 replies 1 reposts 19 likes 11K views View on X
../* Verified account @dotdotslashstar
Cornell 7 defendant Gillio Lopes' filing today concerning joinder of the remaining defendants in the proceeding to disqualify AG James. The four represented defendants agreed to join, no stated position yet from the remaining two.

Filing also includes some preliminary thoughts on yesterday's appointment by James of Jacqueline Kelly to lead the investigation:

> [This] appointment does not eliminate Petitioner's underlying concerns about Attorney James conducting a fair investigation.
Lauren Conlin Verified account @conlin_lauren Oct 29
WATCH: “I expect the documentary to be one-sided, salacious. I'm sure we'll all want to watch it, but I also know that it won't be the whole truth.”

CORNELL SEVEN: The full press conference is below via @lamag, but here's a short exchange where I ask Gillio Lopes' attorney Andrew Miltenberg about Judge Farrell's questions concerning AG Letitia James' social media post, and the Netflix documentary released the very same day as oral arguments.

On Farrell's reaction to James' post, Miltenberg said:

“My personal reading of the argument is that he's already decided that,” referring to whether James' statements were improper.

Miltenberg said he only learned about the documentary that morning, and his initial reaction reflected his surprise that the governor had reportedly participated while the defense had not been approached.

The judge expressed concerns about the joinder issue, questioning why the other six men had not been included in Lopes' challenge.

Farrell gave the defense until Nov. 5 to submit additional information addressing the issue.
View quoted post on X
3 replies 2 reposts 14 likes 2.1K views View on X
../* Verified account @dotdotslashstar
"No, I'm asking you whether you think it's appropriate for a prosecutor to make that statement."

Highlights from just-released transcript of the Oct 29 Article 78 proceeding to disqualify AG Letitia James from the Cornell 7 criminal investigation.

A lot of skepticism toward the state from Judge Farrell. Full transcript here: iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…
Nesenoff & Miltenberg LLP Verified account @NMLLPLaw Oct 30
"The public has lost faith with Attorney James,” Stuart Bernstein said in court. “She has shown no presumption of innocence, she has shown she picked sides … so the question before you: Is she qualified to serve as special prosecutor in this case?”
washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/10…
View quoted post on X