Pinned post
Many have asked how one should value Virtuals, and the one metric that we aim to maximize.
- an agents-as-a-service company that should be valued like a software business, where cash flow is king?
- a meme project disguised as a fundamental tech company, aiming to maximize attention?
- an infrastructure protocol with TVL as the top priority?
kinda right but we are building
A primitive for agents' co-ownership that seeks to achieve decentralization via capitalism
Capitalism is human nature. Convincing someone to stop pursuing profits is a fool's errand. We aim to bring incentive alignment from closed companies to public, permissionless agents.
We want as many people as possible to co-own agents.
Only when the masses have skin in the game financially will they think about doing the right thing. That’s our north star metric.
- an agents-as-a-service company that should be valued like a software business, where cash flow is king?
- a meme project disguised as a fundamental tech company, aiming to maximize attention?
- an infrastructure protocol with TVL as the top priority?
kinda right but we are building
A primitive for agents' co-ownership that seeks to achieve decentralization via capitalism
Capitalism is human nature. Convincing someone to stop pursuing profits is a fool's errand. We aim to bring incentive alignment from closed companies to public, permissionless agents.
We want as many people as possible to co-own agents.
Only when the masses have skin in the game financially will they think about doing the right thing. That’s our north star metric.
