It's not you, it's the platform. I've been taking a break from Twitter/X. You can follow me at infosec.exchange/@gannimo for unfiltered stuff, linkedin.com/in/mathias-pay… for brags, or bsky.app/profile/gannim…
Latest posts 5
The review process is under threat and we must make it resilient against adversarial attacks. Proud to be part of @TheOfficialACM PROTECT where we'll look into securing academic reviewing sigsac.org/protect.html
I'd argue the opposite. General purpose grey box fuzzing research is complete as it is no longer feasible to distinguish between optimizations and over-fitting. Per-target optimizations should be left as an engineering exercise.
Are general-purpose fuzzing research dead? Our answer is probably no. Check our new fuzzer work FOX.
The awesome fuzzer @aflplusplus is already super-powerful and quite an effective baseline in academics and industry. But there is still room to improve upon. We introduce FOX (CCS 2024), a new general-purpose fuzzer. We formulate the fuzzing as a scholastic online control problem and advance the performance of AFL++ by up to 26.45% in real-world standalone programs and 6.59% in FuzzBench programs. Check our talk at CCS'24 @acm_ccs, fuzzing session 1, Oct 16th, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM, at Grand Ballroom Salon F.
Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2406.04517
Code: github.com/FOX-Fuzz/FOXView quoted post on X
France, as always going with the times. Nearby we saw a cyber café as well so they are future proof!
They grow up so fast. Happy first review anniversary to our paper in ACM TOPS! 🥳🎉 Looking forward to getting our first set of reviews soon!
