Twitxy Saved

Gerard DiPippo

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@gdp1985

Director, Global Macro, Eurasia Group. Former RAND China Research Center, Bloomberg Economics, CSIS, DNIO for Economic Issues, and CIA. Views my own.
Washington, DC eurasiagroup.net/people/gdipippo Joined March 2011
1.4K Following 15K Followers 11K Posts

Latest posts 5

Gerard DiPippo Verified account @gdp1985
Totally agree with everything in this @jasonfurman post, both analytically and emotionally. The pipeline problem is real. I wish people wouldn't pretend that most organizations will pay to train junior staff who will end up going elsewhere, especially when facing competitive pressures from other firms using AI. Big companies or the government can maybe do this, but not most firms. We need to think more about how to subsidize expertise (context) building among younger workers.
econvitals Verified account @econvitals Nov 1
✍️ New from Jason Furman: AI Could Do My First Job. Not My Last.

Why I still think AI could do most of what the Council of Economic Advisers did, and what that means for the people who learn by doing that work.

econvitals.org/posts/2026-11-…
View quoted post on X
Gerard DiPippo Verified account @gdp1985
China releases Q3 GDP tonight. In nominal terms, AI is a big part of China’s export boom. Chips and computers account for more than 40% of the recent export increase. But on a net basis, AI trade is weighing on China’s trade surplus. The surplus growth comes from vehicles and other machinery.

The chip export boom is also mostly about prices. In September, China’s chip exports rose 136% in value from a year earlier, but the number of chips rose only 1%. Most of that is memory chips, where the global shortage has driven up prices. So AI trade isn’t adding much to real export growth. If net exports boosted real GDP growth in Q3, it wasn’t because of AI.